A BALL ON 9/11?

I am paying close attention to what people in the know are saying.  I have flown check rides in the jump seat (in the flight deck) with Navy/Air Force pilots on a C-32A (757-200 Vice Presidential jet) when we took off at a climb rate close to the limit of that airplane when I was in Flight Test.  I have flown the same plane at max bank angle when we came off of an aft cargo smoke condition with the aural warnings blaring as we came up on a potential collision course with Mt. Spokane.  I experienced enough g-forces I had to clench up hard on my gut to resist the action.  That along with my lower pelvic platform already clenched and puckered from all the aural warnings.  The cock-pit is literally screaming at you:  Terrain.  Woop, woop - pull up.  Terrain.  Woop, woop - pull up.

Those government pilots liked to take those planes to the their limits.  They cut their teeth on fighter planes that can do much more than a pax airplane.  So, when pilots who fly commercially (911 Pilots for Truth) tell us that they could not have flown any of those planes in the purported attitudes, speeds and maneuvers, I stand up and listen.  I have flown a 777 full cab simulator for several hours until my oldest daughter got vertigo (and we had to leave) and I know that it is impossible to fly the larger stuff (twin aisle, 767 for example) like a fighter jet.  They are maneuverable - but slowly maneuverable.  You need miles to make a maneuver, not hundreds or thousands of yards.  You cannot do this having gone thru rudimentary twin engine flight school with little or no real flying time - and then somehow make that happen with a full size twin engine airplane.  It is ALL a fable - and most people have bought it all.

I like what this guy has to say:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPKq2K2dh6k

It pulls a lot of inconsistencies of the day together into one unified theory.