Eleanor McLean and the Murder of Parley P. Pratt
by Steven Pratt 1
by Steven Pratt 1
Twelve miles northwest of a small Arkansas town called 
Van Buren, Parley P. Pratt was murdered on 13 May 1857. The events that 
precipitated the murder have often been speculated about and discussed 
among students of Mormon history. Most scholars know that Parley’s death
 was connected with his involvement with Eleanor Jane McLean and that 
her estranged husband Hector committed the murder. Though the narrative 
of Parley’s tragic end is available, the full details are not, and these
 need telling so that whatever mystery still surrounds it may be 
resolved.
Eleanor Jane McComb McLean: 1817-1854
Eleanor Jane McComb was born 9 December 1817, in Wheeling, Virginia, to James and Ann McComb. 2
 Little is known of her early life, except that her parents were strict 
Presbyterian and that they moved to Greenville, Louisiana, near New 
Orleans when she was a small child. It was there that she met and 
married Hector McLean in 1841. 3
 They seemed to be happy at first. But Hector started drinking heavily, 
causing a separation in 1844. Eleanor, after seeking counsel from her 
father, two brothers, E. C. and J. J. McComb, and a John McDougal as to 
whether she should return to or leave Hector sent him an ultimatum:
Dear Hector:
Having used every persuation in my power to no effect, I
 see but three alternatives all ending in misery if not in crime. First,
 to live a victum of the vice to which you have became a prey 2nd to to 
seek a home among strangers, or shall the smoothe current of the 
Mississippi be the last page that any may read of my “Ill Fate?”
Your Wife.
E.J. McLean
Your Wife.
E.J. McLean
Hector responded with the following note:
Millikins Bend
December 31, 1844
December 31, 1844
Nea, Ellen neither of these shall ever be your lot. I 
will cease to grieve your gentle spirit, and we will live together so 
long as it is the will and good pleasure of a Heavenly Parent we should.
 We seek an asylum among the people of God (I care not what that may be)
 and by their good example and precept I am persuaded your own dear 
husband, may cure. I must be saved and reformed–it is impossible to be 
either here. I have tried in vain, to live soberly and righteously 
before God and men but cannot accomplish it.
Yours sincerely.
Hector 4
Hector 4
Eleanor then returned to live with him. Sometime later 
they decided to leave New Orleans and go to San Francisco to help 
accomplish Hector’s reform. They were accompanied by their three 
children, Fitzroy, Albert, and Annie, and one of Eleanor’s brothers. 5
It was in San Francisco that they came in contact with 
the Mormon church. After attending a Mormon meeting with Hector, and her
 brother, J.J. McComb, Eleanor wanted to join the Church but was 
forbidden to do so by her husband, who purchased a sword cane and 
threatened to kill her and the minister who baptized her if she became a
 Mormon. 6
 In spite of this threat, Eleanor attended Church meetings as often as 
she could. One Sunday night, while Eleanor was singing from a Mormon 
hymn book she had purchased, Hector tore the book from her hands, threw 
it into the fire, beat her, cast her out into the street, and locked the
 door. She sought the help of a Dr. Bush, the family doctor, who took 
her to a hotel, boarded her there for the night, and charged the bill to
 Hector. The next day she filed a charge of assault and battery against 
Hector, planning to go to San Bernardino to live with the Saints and 
never return. She dropped the charges, however, and returned to Hector, 
following the advice of Dr. Bush and the members of the San Francisco 
branch. 7 She describes the incident as follows:
That Mr. McLean put me by violence into the street at 
night, and locked the door against me, Captain Grey and Dr. Bush are 
witnesses; and I presume McLean himself would not deny that I then 
declared that I would no more be his wife however many years I might be 
compelled to appear as such for the sake of my children. 8
Even though she embraced Mormonism in November of 1851, she was not baptized until 24 May 1854, by William McBride. 9
 Although he had given his written permission for her to be baptized and
 she continued to live with Hector, he forbade her to sing Mormon hymns 
or to read Mormon literature in his home. Eleanor did not comply fully 
with his rules, however, for she made it a practice to hold morning 
devotionals with her children while Hector was away, and sought all 
available means to stay in contact with the Church.
Parley Meets Eleanor
Parley Pratt, having been called by the First Presidency
 to preside over the Pacific Mission and to set up a gathering place for
 the Saints in San Jose, arrived in San Francisco on 2 July 1854. 10
 Upon his arrival, he immediately went to San Jose, picked up his wife 
Elizabeth, who had come to California earlier, and returned to San 
Francisco, where they first rented a small house for $25 a month. When 
it proved to be inadequate, they moved to a larger home on Broadway 
Street which cost them $35 a month. 11
 They had few funds and little to eat but were cared for by members of 
the branch, including Eleanor McLean. She brought the Pratts food, 
bedding, and clothing and became a frequent visitor at their home, often
 arriving at dawn with gifts of meat, bread, fruit and other articles 
which sustained the Pratts until the next day. 12
 This was a great help to Parley, because Elizabeth was sick most of the
 time and could do very little for herself or her husband. During her 
visits, Eleanor told Parley and Elizabeth of her home situation and 
asked Parley to help her solve her problems. Parley did visit the McLean
 home a few times to try to reconcile Hector and Eleanor’s differences, 
but succeeded only in making Hector more bitter. 13
 Eleanor appears to have decided that there was no chance that her 
husband would join the Church, but she decided that her children should 
belong. So on 27 August 1854, she took her two oldest children, Fitzroy 
and Albert, to Union City, where Parley was holding a meeting, and had 
him baptize them into the Church. 14
 Shortly after the two boys were baptized, Hector decided that the only 
way to save his family from the Mormons was to have his wife committed 
to an asylum; consequently he filed a charge of insanity against 
Eleanor. When Parley was informed of Hector’s plan, he assigned a young 
missionary to try to stop Hector.
Hector and the Mormon Cook
John R. Young was one of a group of missionaries working
 in and around San Francisco to obtain funds for their fares to the 
Sandwich Islands. While they were there, Parley, who was the mission 
president, had them tracting, distributing pamphlets, and doing other 
missionary work. John had been assigned to tract the city of San 
Francisco, but Parley released him from that assignment and assigned him
 the delicate task of helping Eleanor McLean keep her membership in the 
Church and keep out of an asylum. When he asked how he was to accomplish
 his assignment, he was instructed to “listen for the whisperings of the
 Spirit and do as it directs and you shall be successful.” Then 
President Pratt and William McBride gave him a blessing. Among other 
things, Parley told John that McLean would not harm a hair of his head. 15
 John went immediately to the McLean home and walked past it singing, “O
 My Father.” When no one responded, he went back to his room and spent 
the remainder of the day reading of Christ’s trial and persecutions in 
Jerusalem. The next morning he returned to the McLean home and finding a
 card in the window advertising for a cook, applied; Hector agreed to 
hire him on a trial basis for a month. For nearly a month John stayed in
 the McLean home cooking, making beds, and performing other household 
chores. His job was not without some danger, however. Daily he would 
take the pistol that Hector threatened to use on the first Mormon that 
set foot in his house from under the pillow, lay it on the window sill 
until he had made the bed, then replace it under the pillow. That Young 
fulfilled his assignment is recorded in his journal:
A week later the directors of the insane asylum, a 
physician, and Mrs. McLain’s brother, who was a banker, called as an 
examining committee. They had a long talk with Mr. and Mrs. McLain, then
 called in the children, who had been kept home for that purpose. After a
 long talk with them, Mrs. McLain suggested that the cook be called. Oh,
 how I prayed that I might be directed to say the right thing and not 
say too much. In answer to the questions, I said: Mrs. McLain comes in 
every day to the kitchen to tell me what she wants and instructs me how 
to do it. She is always calm and sensible in her talk. I see no evidence
 of insanity in her conduct. As to McLain, I can say but little. He 
stays in his room until breakfast is ready and immediately afterwards, 
goes to his office. When he returns at night, his step does not seem as 
firm and steady as it does in the morning. He appears nervous and walks 
about and talks a good deal to himself.” Mrs. McLain’s brother seemed 
pleased with my statement. The committee decided that Mr. McLain had no 
grounds for his complaint, and the shadow of the insane asylum was 
dispelled. I felt very happy about this, but a few days later something 
else happened. A man called at the bank where Mr. McLain was a cashier. 
After a few minutes of business conversation, he said: “I want to ask 
you a question. You seemed so pronounced against the Mormons. Why do you
 employ a missionary as cook in your home?” McLain seemed surprised and 
the man continued: “Do you not know that he is the same young man who 
was tracting the city and selling Mormon Literature? McLain hurried home
 and coming to me, demanded: “Are you a Mormon?” “Yes sir,” I answered. 
Shaking his fist in my face, he exclaimed, “If you were not a child, I 
would kill you.” “What have I done that you should want to kill me?” 
“You are teaching the false doctrines of Joseph Smith.”
I asked what was false in the doctrines. He replied that
 we claimed to confer the Holy Ghost by the laying on of hands, while 
the scriptures declare that it has been done away and is not needed in 
this day. I asked him for a reference. He took his bible and tried to 
find it, but his hands shook so that he could not find the passage he 
sought. I took the Bible from his hands, turned to 2nd Chapter of Acts, 
38 and 39 verses and read to him “Then Peter said unto them, Repent and 
be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the 
remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost. For 
the promise is unto you and to your children and all that are far off, 
even as many as the Lord our God shall call.” He sprang up, went into 
the other room and returned with two twenty dollar gold coins in his 
hands. Giving me the money he said: “Here are your month’s wages. You 
are dismissed.” 16
John Young left and used the forty dollars to pay his fare to Honolulu.
Hector’s Retaliation
Shortly after Young left, Hector took the children, put 
them on the ship Sierra Nevada, and sent them to their grandparents in 
New Orleans. When he returned home that evening, he told Eleanor what he
 had done, saying, “Now they are where you and the cursed Mormons can 
never see them again!” Then he locked Eleanor in her room. About two in 
the morning Hector released her since she had cried so much that it 
disturbed him. The next morning she attempted unsuccessfully to find the
 children. Her brother, E. C. McComb, suggested that she take the next 
steamer and follow the children, but McLean would not let her. 17
 She then obtained $20 and some goods from a local merchant which she 
gave to Amasa Lyman for safekeeping, planning to use them to finance her
 trip to New Orleans. When Hector heard of her plans, he boasted that 
she was in his power and that if she attempted to go he would have her 
in the insane asylum in twenty-four hours. This, however, proved an 
empty threat, as two weeks after the departure of the children, in 
February 1855, he even helped pay her fare on the steamer Daniel Webster
 bound for New Orleans. 18 She was also assisted in paying her fare by Parley, 19 whom she wrote on 5 February 1855:
Brother Pratt,
I have some goods and 20$, in gold in Amasa Lyman’s 
hands. Will you be so kind as to see what can be done, in order that 
whatever they are worth may be available to me, at as early a date as 
may be convenient. I am called suddenly to depart for a distant shore, 
and would feel obliged to you to attend to this matter, for I expect to 
need all the funds I can raise to defend myself in the midst of my 
enemies.
Feb 5th 1855 Your Sister in hope
Eleanor J. McLean 20
Eleanor J. McLean 20
Parley wrote to Amasa Lyman on 2 March informing him 
that Eleanor had been “called suddenly away to New Orleans–& never 
expects to see this country again, But to make her way to Zion with her 
children, if she can get the means,” 21
 and asking him to send her things to her by the first trustworthy 
messenger. This Amasa did, and they enabled her eventually to make her 
way to Utah.
The children had been sent to New Orleans accompanied by
 neither friend nor relatives. They traveled by ship to San Juan, 
Nicaragua, and then by steamer to New Orleans, arriving 13 February. 22 They were taken to their maternal grandparents.
Eleanor arrived in New Orleans on 2 March and went immediately to find her children. 23
 She remained in her father’s house three months, being closely guarded 
at all times lest she should try to take the children. She did attempt 
to remove them, however, and kept them hidden four days, but was 
unsuccessful in getting out of the city. Her father then pledged to 
change his treatment of her and let her have a room and free access to 
the children if she pledged she would not take them out of the city. She
 agreed and returned to her father’s house. Under these circumstances 
her health declined, and finally she asked her father to help her 
arrange passage to Salt Lake. She was given the means to take the May 
Flower to St. Louis and then the Alma to Atchison, Kansas, where she 
found a Mormon emigration party that hired her as a cook to pay her way 
to Salt Lake. She arrived in Salt Lake on 11 September 1855. 24
Parley and Eleanor: 1854-1855
We do not know what the relationship between Eleanor and
 Parley was during the 1854-55 San Francisco period other than that he 
tried to help her solve her domestic difficulties and she assisted the 
Pratts with gifts of food and clothes. After she had left for New 
Orleans in 1855, Parley wrote his wife Belinda that he had met a worthy 
soul who then was in deep tribulation, who, he hoped, could make her way
 to Zion. 25
 After Parley’s death in 1857, Eleanor wrote that she had “often sought 
his society” at the home “he kept with his wife, Elizabeth, in San 
Francisco. . . .” 26
 Whatever their feelings, Eleanor remained with her husband until she 
went to New Orleans to get her children back, however estranged they had
 become. When she left San Francisco she left Hector, and later she was 
to state in a court of law that she had left him as a wife the night he 
drove her from their home. Whatever the legal situation, she thought of 
herself as an unmarried woman. 27
For Time and Eternity
After Parley arrived home in Salt Lake from California on 18 August 1855, 28
 he worked in the Endowment House and went on a couple of local 
missions, speaking, and attending to local Church business. Eleanor 
arrived in September and went to the Pratt home to apply for a position 
as a school-teacher. 29
 She was accepted, and one month after her arrival in Salt Lake, Eleanor
 and Parley were married. The ceremony took place in the Endowment House
 on 14 November 1855, and was performed by Brigham Young. Parley’s 
journal records the marriage ceremony in these words: “Ministered in the
 Endowments and had Sister Eleanor Jane McComb of N. Orleans sealed to 
me at the alter by President Brigham Young.” 30 The Pratt Family Record also notes the marriage, adding that they were married for time and eternity. 31
 Eleanor was looked upon as one of Parley’s plural wives from that time 
on, and was referred to by family and friends as Eleanor Pratt. 32
Eleanor remained in Salt Lake for one year, serving as 
schoolteacher for Parley’s children for seven months and then boarding 
in Brigham Young’s house for four months and teaching the governor’s 
family school. 33
 But with Parley’s call to a mission in the Eastern States on 24 August 
1856, Eleanor, thinking to regain her children, bring them to Utah, and 
raise them there, asked Parley to let her accompany him on his mission.
Eleanor Returns to New Orleans
Traveling by way of Fort Kearney, through Iowa and Illinois, they arrived in St. Louis on 18 November, 34
 where Eleanor borrowed $100 of Church funds and proceeded to New 
Orleans. She went to her father’s home and, by telling him that she had 
reconsidered her stand on Mormonism and did not believe it anymore, 
gained liberty with the children. She stayed at her father’s house for a
 week, then she and her two youngest children (Albert and Annie) took a 
steam car from her father’s home to New Orleans, a distance of several 
miles, from where she wrote a letter to her father telling him that she 
was now Mrs. Pratt and that she and the children were going to Utah. 35
 She had hoped to leave on a steamer for Galveston, Texas, but when no 
steamer was to leave for almost a week, she took a room in the United 
States Hotel kept by a Mrs. Smith. The next morning, deeming it unsafe 
to stay in a public house, she took an omnibus, leaving the children at 
the hotel, and rode far down in the third municipality. There she found a
 furnished room across the street from a Dutch grocery store and, 
together with the children, stayed for four days. Thursday morning, 18 
December 1856, they boarded the Atlantic bound for Texas; and at 
Galveston they took the the steamer Captain Pierce to Harrisburg, where 
they stayed all night at a hotel kept by a Captain Andrews. The next 
morning they went to Houston. Two miles from Houston they found a place 
to stay at the residence of William Gambell, where they were treated 
very well. While there, Eleanor worked as a seamstress in a Mrs. 
Stansbury’s dressmaking shop. On 4 March, Eleanor and the children left 
Houston with Captain Andrews, Mr. Stanfield, and James Gambell to 
journey to Ellis County, where a Mormon emigration group was fitting out
 for a trip across the plains. Learning in Houston by letter that Hector
 was in pursuit of her, Eleanor decided to take a passage with a man by 
the name of Clark, who was not a Mormon. He had a wife, three children, a
 poor wagon and three yoke of good oxen. It was while they were 
traveling with these people that McLean met them a little west of 
Arkansas. 36
Parley’s Tour of the East
Parley visited various eastern states from December 1856 to March 1857. 37
Throughout his eastern mission, Parley kept in touch with his wives by mail. In January (1857) he wrote:
I have heard from E, once since she sailed from St. 
Louis. She had arrived in safety in her father’s house, & found her 
two children alive and in tolerable health. She is living there in quiet
 with them. She may make it back soon. 38
And in February he added:
I arrived in the states all well, in Novr. E soon went 
south, found her c . . . ren well, staid at her father’s one week, and 
escaped with the c . . . ren to Texas. She may return to St. Louis, and 
may not. She may go by land a thousand miles northward through Texas, 
Indian Territory, and Kansas to get to the Platte River. A Texas company
 of saints talk of coming that way. 39
During his visits to Cincinnati, it is claimed that 
Mormon apostates informed McLean of Pratt’s eastern itinerary, setting 
him on Parley’s trail. 40
 However he found out where Pratt was to be, McLean followed him 
throughout the eastern states and almost caught him in St. Louis in 
March of 1857. Erastus Snow relates:
Early in March Mrs. Rushton who some years ago belonged 
to the Saints and still professed friendship for us came to George A. 
Smith and told him that she had learned through a police officer that H.
 McLean was in St. Louis and seeking Elder Pratt’s Life: That the city 
police had orders for his lowing night. She further said that many 
apostates in the city were leagued with McLean for the accomplishment of
 his purpose. From a variety of circumstances we became satisfied that 
this information was in substance correct and Elder Pratt had for some 
days previously felt the approaching danger and kept himself retired.
We now thought it advisable for him to leave the City 
privately and after concealing him one day we found means to disguise 
him and send him to Bro. Browns in Belfountain Cemetery, where on the 
following morning by day break I sent him Bro. Sprowl with a satchel of 
clothes and some $100 expense money and he accompanied by Elder Sprowl 
left place immediately and traveled a circitous route westward avoiding 
the roads, until he deemed himself safe. When he dismissed Bro. Andrew 
Sprowl some 12 miles from the City and steered his course westward he 
sent word by Elder S. not to be uneasy if we did not hear of him again 
in a year.
In the meantime McLean assisted by the police and 
apostates continued searching the houses of the Saints and all places 
frequented by us in the City, and adjacient county but without finding 
the object of their search. 41
George Higginson and the Cherokee Mission
George Higginson and Riley Perryman were working as 
missionaries among the Creek and Cherokee Nations in the Indian 
Territory. In the spring of 1857, they expanded their labors and 
traveled a great deal to met and contact as many as they could before 
their April conference. In the early part of March, George and some 
Indian members started up the “Verdigree” one Saturday morning to attend
 the funeral of Prince Perryman. About noon, after coming to Little 
Spring Creek and stopping for lunch, they noticed a man riding on 
horseback full speed toward them. Thinking it was the U. S. Marshal come
 to remove them from the Indian Nations for preaching the gospel, he and
 his companions rode off as fast as possible. The rider soon caught up 
with them, steered straight for George, and asked if his name was 
Higginson. Receiving an affirmative reply, the rider asked George to 
ride business with him. George refused to go unless the rider identified
 himself, at which the rider drew closer and whispered “Parley P. 
Pratt.” Parley being in disguise, George doubted his word until Parley 
produced a letter Higginson had written to J. H. Hart in St. Louis. As 
they rode on together, Parley said that he was “flying from death” and 
sought protection in the Indian Nations.
After the Perryman funeral, George took Parley up the 
River “Verdigree” to Joseph Burgess, who secluded Parley in his home, 
which was on the edge of a large prairie. Parley was introduced as Elder
 Parker from New York, and stayed in the Burgess home until 6 April when
 he went to conference at Mr. Jack Randoll’s house. During the 
conference Parley asked George to go the frontiers of Texas to look for 
Eleanor and convey some letters to her that informed her of Parley’s 
whereabouts. George went as requested, but after traveling for 200 miles
 found that the Mormon train was yet 300 miles south of him. He then 
hastened back to the Arkansas River to report to Parley and receive 
instructions. Arriving at Fort Gibson on 6 May, George found a letter 
informing him of Parley’s whereabouts. 42
 He returned to the Texas road, and having ridden about five miles 
spotted a man about a mile ahead of him, overtook him, and found it to 
be Parley. Parley told him that he was determined to travel until he met
 Eleanor. George asked Parley if he felt safe traveling the public road.
 Parley replied that he thought so for no one had inquired about him. 
Shortly thereafter George saw a military escort armed with muskets 
coming toward them. He said, “Brother Parley here comes an escort of 
soldiers armed.” Parley paused and replied, “Yes. They are certainly in 
persuit of me. I must have been watched it is all over now.” The 
captain, whose name was Little, rode up to Parley and said, “Parley P. 
Pratt. I arrest you in the name of the United States of America.” 43
Hector’s Pursuit
As soon as Eleanor had left New Orleans with her 
children, her father sent word to Hector in San Francisco. Hector came 
immediately to New Orleans, then searched for Parley throughout the 
East, almost capturing him in St. Louis in March 1857. Failing that, he 
decided to look for Eleanor, because he heard that she might be in 
Texas. He found in Houston that she had left earlier to join a Mormon 
train to Utah, so he went back to New Orleans. From there he went to 
Fort Gibson with the hope of catching Eleanor there. On arriving at Fort
 Gibson, he inquired if anyone had seen Eleanor or anyone fitting her 
description. None had, but after he related some of his troubles to the 
postal official and had given descriptions of Parley and Eleanor, the 
official produced some letters written to a Mrs. Lucy Parker from Mr. P.
 Pratt Parker. 44
 Hector knew immediately whose letters they were. He filed a formal 
charge with the commissioner in Fort Gibson and went in pursuit of 
Eleanor, while the soldiers and his friend Shaw looked for Parley. 45
 While riding a little west of what is now Arkansas, he came upon a 
rider by the name of John Peel, who told him where Eleanor could be 
found. 46
 He met Eleanor’s wagon on 6 May, and with another man rode up to the 
wagon, took the children, and rode off. About three hours later, Eleanor
 was arrested by a man styled the “State Marshal” on a charge of larceny
 of clothing belonging to Albert and Annie McLean to the amount of ten 
dollars. Three other names appeared in this same charge: Parley P. 
Pratt, James Gammell, and Elias J. Gammell. 47
On the Road to Fort Gibson
The “marshal” took Eleanor to a hotel in the Indian town
 of North Fork. She saw twelve armed men in the gallery in a state of 
“great excitement.” These twelve men were some of Hector’s Mason friends
 gathered from “all parts of the territory” to aid him, should the 
“government take no notice” of his grievances. 48
The next morning a party consisting of the “marshal” 
(Shivers), Eleanor, and twelve armed men, set out on horseback. When 
they had ridden about fifteen miles, Shivers asked Eleanor if she would 
like to see Mr. Pratt. She replied: “Not in tribulation such as I am in.
 He is a good man, and I know his family and would be sorry to see him 
as a prisoner. Is he in this part of the country?” “Well he’s not forty 
miles from here,” was the answer. This was the first Eleanor had heard 
that Parley was in the Indian Territory; the last she had heard, he was 
in St. Louis. They rode until noon and then stopped at an Indian’s house
 for dinner. Eleanor noticed that the mob, which was composed of some of
 Hector’s friends, had increased. When they remounted the horses, she 
noticed Hector, who had the children in a carriage some distance from 
the house, give the lines to another, buckle on a sword in addition to 
his pistol, and ride off. The marshal informed Eleanor that “they had 
got Pratt; and McLean is determined to kill him, but we are bound to 
prevent him while he is our prisoner.” 49
 When they had ridden a half mile from the house, they came upon the 
military unit that had arrested Parley. As they drew near, Eleanor could
 see Parley lying near a stream, with his hands under his head. He was 
wearing a blue checked shirt and dark pants. When they dismounted, 
Eleanor asked if she could speak to Parley. Given permission, she 
advanced towards him. Parley rose and extended his hand. Eleanor said, 
“How do you do, Brother Pratt.” “Very well Madam, how is your health,” 
Parley replied. “I am well in health, but that demon who has been in my 
pathway these thirteen years has again crossed my way. He has torn my 
children again from me and he says I shall never see them again.” Parley
 then said, “Well, my sister, never mind, these things are all in one 
short lifetime and life is but a speck of eternity and will soon be 
over.” Eleanor turned to him and said, “Brother Parley, I rejoice in one
 thing. Mormonism has taught me how to live and taken from me all fear 
of death and the grave.” Then she raised her hand and voice and turned 
to the crowd and said, “Now you civil and military officers and soldiers
 you can only kill the body and after that you have no power over the 
soul, do what you please I am ready and willing to die as to live but 
that is my Father’s business not mine.” 50
The marshall then read the charges to Parley. Someone in
 the crowd pointed to George Higginson, who was with Parley, and asked 
what was going to be done with him. Though both Captain Little and 
Marshal Shivers said they had no power to arrest him, he was placed 
under guard until such time as they deemed it safe to release him. They 
rode on to Fort Gibson, Parley riding with a rope tied around his right 
ankle, the other end held by an Indian riding alongside him as a guard. 
Reaching the fort at midnight, after a twenty-five mile forced ride, 
Parley and George Higginson were placed in jail with a heavy guard, and 
Eleanor was taken to a boarding house. She was so bruised and mutilated 
from the ride and violence of the day before that she had to be lifted 
from her horse and carried into the house. 51
An Important Letter from Fort Gibson
After Hector had left Eleanor at the hotel, on the way 
to Fort Gibson, he went out to meet his friend Captain Little at the 
spring where Parley and Eleanor were to meet later. Making sure that 
Parley was securely arrested, he traveled to the Creek Agency, where he 
stayed with his friend, Mr. Whitfield. They started for Fort Gibson, 
escorted by Perkins and the rest of the “Masonic Brethren,” and arrived 
on 7 May. 52
While in Fort Gibson, Hector wrote a letter to some friends in St. Louis:
Fort Gibson
Cherokee Nation
May 7th, 1857
Cherokee Nation
May 7th, 1857
Dear Friends:–I have just arrived from a sore tramp, in 
which I succeeded in coming up with Eleanor and the children, and have 
taken the children from her by force. I have placed Eleanor in charge of
 the U. S. Marshal, and have succeeded also in arresting Pratt, who is 
now in the guard-house of the Fort. The U.S. Marshal will start with his
 prisoners for Van Buren tomorrow, and I will by a different route, in 
company of Capt. Cahil and lady, leave with the children for the same 
place. I arrested Pratt and R. (E) J. on charge of larceny, in stealing 
the clothing on the children when kidnapped–in the value $8 to $10. It 
is the only way I could arrest them in these Territories. When I fail 
before the U. S. Commissioner at Van Buren, I mean to have Pratt 
arrested for having fled from justice from St. Louis, Mo., and get a 
requisition from the Governor of Missouri for him. You are fully posted.
 See Strong, and inform him forthwith of the best manner of proceeding.
There are several things that can be learned from this 
letter: (1) Hector realized that the charge of larceny would not hold up
 before the U. S. Commissioner in Van Buren; (2) he was planning to have
 Parley charged in St. Louis with higher crimes and was asking his 
lawyer to take care of the necessary arrangements; and (3) larceny was 
the only charge he could come up with in Indian Territory to have 
Eleanor and Parley arrested. Hector was using the arrest in Indian 
Territory as a pretext to give him time to get a requisition from the 
governor of Missouri and thus enable him to put Parley in prison. His 
plan failed, however.
Eleanor’s Defense
After spending Friday at the fort, Eleanor, Parley, 
George and company started for Van Buren on Saturday, 9 May. They 
traveled the two days following, Eleanor in a carriage driven by two 
soldiers and Parley and George chained to each other on horseback. The 
group arrived in Van Buren, Arkansas, the place of the trial, about noon
 on 11 May. Hector, traveling by a different route, had gone to Fort 
Smith and left the children there. He, Captain Cahil, and Major Rector 
also arrived in Van Buren on 11 May. 54
 Parley was sent to jail, Higginson released, and Eleanor taken before 
the judge and lawyers. At first Judge Ogden was severe in tone, but 
after Eleanor had answered a few questions his attitude changed. She 
described her experience as follows:
He first said, “I suppose you understand madam that you 
have been arrested upon a charge of larceny?” “Yes, Sir, I know the 
charge but it is false.” “Well madam, I suppose you will not deny that 
you were happy with Mr. McLean until this man Pratt and Mormonism 
crossed your pathways.” “Yes Sir, I must declare that many years before I
 heard Mormonism McLean drove happiness from our home by inbibing that 
spirit that comes in bottles! And because I was a mother I would fain 
have escaped the impending fate foreshadowed in the breath of a man who 
had learned to love wine more that he loves the happiness of the wife of
 his bosom. And down through thirteen long years I suffered this blight,
 and at length he put me by violence into the street in a dark winter’s 
night in a wicked city, and I was compelled to seek shelter and 
protection in a public house. And do you suppose Sir, a woman conscious 
of having done her duty as a virtuous wife and faithful mother could be 
induced to come again to the arms of that man? No Sir, it was not 
Mormonism that desolated McLean’s home–but that spirit that comes in 
bottles, prepared his heart and him for deeds of desperation and at last
 he found a pretext in my religion, that was unpopular, and upon this 
ground he might treat his family with personal violence,–thrust his wife
 into the street and lock the doors–send his children, while yet infants
 upon the high seas to go many thousands of miles without one friend 
they had ever seen. And now it is no marvel that he is prepared to tell a
 lie and swear to it–imprison innocent persons, and drag them before an 
excited populace in a land where mob law bid defiance to the 
Constitutional government and the Civil Courts. I have no hope of 
justice in this land Sir. If I had a chance I could bring truthful 
testimony from the days of my childhood until the present moment, that I
 have lived a life of strict virtue, industry and faithfulness in the 
duties belonging to my station. But I see no motive. For after all the 
adopted course of this government, would sanction my imprisonment and 
perhaps the shedding of my blood. Because I will not deny what I know to
 be the Truth of Heaven!
“Well Madam, do you acknowledge your father to be a 
truthful man?” Yes Sir. Here then is a letter from him, which confirms 
Mr. McLean’s statements. I read, “She was honored and beloved by her 
family and highly esteemed in the society in which she moved. Mr. McLean
 went to Cal. and by industry procured a home, sent for his family, and 
they were happy in San Fran. until/Mormonism, and its wiley Elder, began
 to throw their seductive influence about my unfortunate daughter!”
Well Sir. I will still say my father is a truthful man 
but honest men are often deceived. And I claim this mother to be the 
best judge. In all the years to which he alludes, I was in McLean’s 
kitchen, parlor and bed room, while my father was at peace in the midst 
of his own household thousands of miles distant. And if my husband came 
enraged and intoxicated to either neglect or abuse his family how could 
my father know it? Who but a wife knows bedroom scenes? It is true if I 
had gone for my neighbors and brought them to see him lying with his 
head hanging nearly off the bed, one coat sleeve off, and the other on, 
one boot off and the other on, and the vomit over his boots and all 
richly perfumed with old bourbon, (or some other well known beverage 
that adorns the shelves of the fashionable saloon). Then I might have 
hundreds of witnesses to what I now state. But the opposite of this was 
my course. I studiously concealed year after year the viper that clung 
to the secret fibers of my soul. He was not a man that drank and mingled
 much with his fellowmen, nor did he often drink enough before leaving 
his place of business to betray to anyone, that he drank at all. But a 
copious draft just as he left, and then another out of his secret 
bottle, before a 5 o’clock dinner, and then after dinner another; laid 
the strong man low. Yet who but a wife could know of this state of 
things. If he could not eat dinner he was sick. If he vomited It is 
because he was sick, and the children pitied “pa” because he was sick! 
And if a neighbor called he was excused on the same ground. The wife 
might shed a million tears of untold bitterness between the setting and 
rising of the sun; and who could know it? Could the husband who lay on 
the dead sleep of the inebriated all these lonesome hours realize that 
she had known no rest? And when she stood beside him at break of day 
with toast and tea to stay his stomach and clear his brain, so that no 
betrayal of his vice, might reach his business place or even the nearest
 neighbours? Was there any witness? When he enjoyed a refreshing 
mornings’ nap, a good breakfast and sallied forth at 9 o’clock in a 
clean suit, would any neighbors or friends suspect him? And if he 
delivered a strong temperance speech the following night as a grand 
worthy Patriarch of the Order Sons of Temperance, was there any to 
betray him? Nea gentlemen, but I tell you God and the holy angels 
witness these things and before them I am clear as the morning’s dew.
The Judge then said, “I think madam it is the mind of 
the District Attorney to release you as a prisoner and call you as a 
witness in this case.” “Well sir, I am in your power and you can do as 
you please. But I hope to be protected from insult or personal injury.”
“Oh yes Madam, you will be taken to the best hotel and all your wants attended to, and no one shall molest you.”
“Thank you Sir.” 55
The lawyers then asked her several questions about Utah 
and the condition of the women there. After they had finished their 
questions, the “marshal” (Shivers) took her to a hotel.
The next morning (12 May) when court convened, a crowd 
rushed into courtroom, anxious to see the proceedings. Eleanor was 
there, having come twenty minutes before court was to begin. They then 
brought in Parley as soon as Judge Ogden had taken his place. Parley 
looked weary and weak, having spent the whole night in jail with no food
 and little sleep. He seated himself near Eleanor with his counsel, 
Henry Wilcox. The first thing Judge Ogden did was to dismiss the charges
 against Eleanor. He said, “Mrs. McLean, the court finds nothing against
 you. You can retire.” Eleanor hesitated, then said to Judge Ogden, 
“Judge, I have been assured by the officers both Civil and Military that
 here I would once again see my children, and if this is the only place I
 may ever see them I wish to stay.” The Judge said, “Well madam you are 
at liberty; but not compelled to leave, you are no longer a prisoner.” 
Eleanor then went back to the hotel following the advice of a lawyer, 
John T. Humphreys. 56
The Trial of Parley Pratt
After Eleanor had left, the charges were read to Parley 
by McLean, who was allowed to state the history of his grievances, and 
read evidences to the court that “implicated” Parley. He succeeded in 
stirring up feelings against Parley among the five hundred spectators. 57
 When Parley arose to respond to the charges, Hector drew his pistol and
 pointed it at him but was prevented from firing by the officers of the 
court. 58
 Because of the excitement of the crowd and McLean’s display, Judge 
Ogden postponed the trial until four o’clock that evening. The crowd 
reluctantly allowed the officers to lock Parley in jail, and crowded the
 courtroom and courtyard long before it was time for the trial to start.
 Judge Ogden postponed the trial further until the next morning at eight
 o’clock. 59
 This was a trick, however, to deceive McLean, for later that evening 
the real marshal, Mr. Hays, called on Eleanor with George Higginson and 
told them that Parley had been acquitted by the court and was only kept 
in jail for his own personal safety and would be released as soon as it 
was deemed prudent to do so. 60
Early on Wednesday, 13 May 1857, Judge Ogden brought 
Parley’s horse to him at the jail. He released Parley, put him on his 
horse and offered him his knife and pistol, but Parley refused by 
saying, “Gentlemen, I do not rely on weapons of that kind, my trust is 
in my God. Good-bye Gentlemen.” He rode off in a southerly direction. 61
The Murder
Yes, I have a family at Salt Lake City, Utah Territory 
and that is my home. My gold is in this pocket (pointing to his pants) 
and my gold watch is in this, and I want them with all my effects sent 
to my family in Salt Lake, write to a Mr. Couch Flint Post Office 
Cherokee Nation and let him have all my things to send to my family. 62
Parley asked the men to communicate with a Mormon train and have some of them take his body back to Utah. 63 He then desired to leave his dying testimony with these men saying,
I die a firm believer in the Gospel of Jesus Christ as 
revealed through the Prophet Joseph Smith, and I wish you to carry this 
my dying testimony. I know that the Gospel is true and that Joseph Smith
 was a prophet of the living God, I am dying a martyr to the faith. 64
Parley’s voice weakened and finally ceased.
At about half past noon a lady came to the hotel in Van 
Buren where Eleanor was staying and told her that Parley had been shot. A
 later report said he was wounded but not dead. Then McLean appeared on 
the scene. He and few friends were drinking at the bar of the hotel when
 Mr. Smith, the landlord, approached them and asked McLean what he had 
done. Hector raped, “Well, I have done a good work.” Then the crowd 
began talking of lynching Eleanor, one saying, “Come now let us lynch 
her, twile not do to let her escape.” Mr. Smith broke in:
How dare you speak in that manner in my house. If any 
man attempts to molest that lady while she is in my house he must do it 
over my dead body, for I will protect her while she is under my roof. 
The man that would so disgrace his kind as to suggest such a thing had 
better not be seen again on my premises.
A few minutes later McLean crossed the Arkansas River 
and boarded a boat. Just before he stepped on deck he spoke to a man on 
the street and said, “Sir if you will go out eight or ten miles on a 
certain road you might do a deed of humanity,” and then he sailed off. 65
Eleanor and George Visit the Murder Scene
After Eleanor received definite word that Parley was 
dead, she asked Marshal Hays if she and George Higginson might go 
prepare the body for burial. The marshal said he would furnish a wagon 
and take them out to the site the next morning. Upon entering the Winn 
farm house they saw Parley’s body lying on a board. Mr. Winn told them 
about the murder and took them to the scene. They saw where Parley had 
fallen near a stump and had crawled to and used it to try to stop the 
bleeding. They also found several papers that he tried to use as a 
compress. Although Parley had lived about two hours after being 
attacked, he had bled to death. Examination of his body and clothing 
showed six bullet holes around the skirt of his coat and two knife marks
 in the front. One was in a V form over the left breast, but this did 
not penetrate to the body. The second, the fatal wound, was to the left 
of the first and about two inches long; this went directly to the heart.
 They also found evidence that a bullet had struck his collarbone and 
bounced off. Mr. Winn informed them that when asked if they should send 
for a doctor, Parley had said, “I want no doctors for I will be dead in a
 few minutes.” 66
When Eleanor and George arrived, the body had been 
washed, the face shaved, and all necessary materials made available for 
their use. George and the marshal put clean clothing on the body and 
Eleanor wrapped it from head to foot in white linen, which she had 
obtained from Mr. Smith at the hotel. She returned to the hotel in Van 
Buren, being advised to do so by the marshal because of the animosity 
that prevailed in the area. Parley’s body was placed in a white pine box
 made by William Steward at the request of James Orme, Justice of the 
Peace, and driven by John Steward to Sterman’s Graveyard (now known as 
Fine Springs) about twelve miles northeast of Van Buren. 67 There Parley was buried by George Higginson about ten o’clock the night of 14 May 1857. 68
Eleanor Returns to Salt Lake
Eleanor, without means to leave Van Buren, was compelled
 to stay until a way could be provided. The lawyers continued to call 
daily to question her on when she planned to leave, but she replied that
 she “knew nothing on the subject” and could not leave then because she 
lacked money and clothing.
This situation continued for several days, until the 
district attorney persuaded her that if she would go to see her parents 
in New Orleans just once more, “the means would flow freely.” Eleanor 
promised to go if the way were provided for her escape if she would run 
into trouble in New Orleans. The lawyers still insisted that she go 
because her father had attempted to see her while she was on trial but 
couldn’t because of sickness and forced to return home. Eleanor promised
 to go. On Monday morning, 18 May, Marshal Hays, Judge Ogden, and an 
unnamed lawyer gave Eleanor $54.50 to pay her expenses to New Orleans. 
The Judge had collected this money from various people in Van Buren, 69
 and he told her that he sympathized with Parley and had never seen a 
man quite like him, so “uncomplaining and free from every feeling of 
revenge.” He told Eleanor that he had instructed Hector to leave Parley 
alone because he had failed to prove one thing against him:
I pleaded with him until two o’clock in the morning, I 
kept him in my office and talked with him, and told him I did not wish 
violence done to the prisoner, and I hope he would not incite men to 
take his life. And he [McLean] said he did not wish any man to touch 
him, that that was a priviledge he wished to reserve to himself.
Judge Ogden continued, “I am doubly grieved when I reflect that he [Pratt] was a grand Master Mason.” Eleanor replied:
And not only so, he was a mighty man of God and this day
 tens of thousands of men, women, and children (not to mention his 
numerous family) would fain bring their tribute of unsophisticated 
affection & gratitude. And I know not of a nation where the news of 
his cruel death will not produce a sensation of grief and irreparable 
loss.
The judge also spoke of the men who had assisted McLean 
and said that they could not escape punishment. The lawyer then spoke up
 and asked if the Mormons would not avenge Parley’s death. Eleanor told 
them that they need have no fear on that score, for Hector and his 
friends would be judged by God and get their just reward. Eleanor then 
told them that she had composed a song on the death of Parley and wished
 to sing it to them, which she did. 70
 After the song, she read them an article she had written for the 
Arkansas Intelligencer and asked them to see that it was printed. The 
judge said that he would see that every word of it was published. 71
 He then handed her a five-dollar gold piece and went on board the boat 
to arrange passage for her down the Arkansas River to the Mississippi. 
Mr. Smith, the landlord of the hotel, took Eleanor to the boat (the H.L.
 Tucker), introduced her to its captain and made sure that she would be 
cared for.
They were five days reaching the Mississippi, landing at
 Napoleon to let off some passengers. Eleanor was afraid to leave the 
boat because most of the men on board that had gone ashore were 
gamblers. Feeling unsafe on the boat also, she asked the protection of 
the captain, who said he would protect her but made it clear that he did
 not approve of her. She stayed on board until the first boat going to 
New Orleans was available; she boarded the Queen of the West, and 
traveled directly to the Baton Rouge area. While on board, she became 
acquainted with a couple named Walker, who were spiritualists. She told 
them of her peculiar situation and requested that Mr. Walker take a 
letter to her father, and then write back to her at Bayou Sara when it 
was safe for her to proceed to New Orleans. Mr. Walker promised he would
 deliver the letter. She waited at Bayou Sara, a hundred miles from the 
city, for three days, hoping to hear from either Mr. Walker or her 
father. Finally she decided she had better go to New Orleans. She took a
 packet, stayed at a friend’s house until the next morning, and then, 
taking a steam car to her father’s neighborhood, stopped at a hotel. 
From there she sent her father a note informing him that she had been 
advised by the district attorney and Judge Ogden of the state of 
Arkansas to see him, and that he could reach her until 11:00 a.m. at the
 Carolton Hotel, and at 11 Gracier Street from 4:00 to 5:00 p.m. Her 
father replied by note that he would meet her that afternoon. When she 
inquired at 11 Gracier Street for J.S. McComb, she was told that he had 
been there, but had left word that he did not wish to see her. As she 
was leaving, she met her brother-in-law, Dr. Cambell, who was living 
with his family in her father’s house. He assured her that he was her 
friend and had decided to see her when her father had refused. They 
talked freely, and when Dr. Cambell left, Eleanor felt assured that she 
had at least one friend in New Orleans. Dr. Cambell visited her a number
 of times, passing notes between her and her parents. The substance of 
these notes was that they wished her to give up her religion and come 
back to them. She responded by testifying of the truths of Mormonism. 
She remained in New Orleans four days, affording her parents ample 
opportunity to see her; but they did not come, and she didn’t go to them
 for fear of meeting McLean. 72
 The day before she left, she learned that her oldest brother, David, 
had come from Memphis, empowered by McLean to act as his agent and have 
her arrested upon a charge of insanity, that he had sworn an oath before
 the court that she was a maniac, and that the papers were in the hands 
of the sheriff for her arrest. 73
 She went to the private residence of Randall Hunt, a lawyer, and 
related her case to him, asking his counsel. He listened to her story 
and told her that McLean had no case against her, but that she had 
better leave, for McLean might put her in an asylum for a time to see if
 he could make her insane. She left New Orleans and went back to Bayou 
Sara, where she found several notes from her parents in one envelope. 
These stated that they never wanted to see her again, that when she had 
taken upon herself the name of Mrs. Pratt, she had cut off all their 
sympathy for her. With that disappointment, she left the New Orleans 
area, never to return.
She took the James E. Woodruff to St. Louis, arriving on
 11 June. As she stepped off the boat, she noticed H. J. Bartlete, 
another brother-in-law, talking to a couple on board the ship. Eleanor 
walked by, paying no attention to them. She had anticipated that she 
would be followed, so she asked the clerk of the boat to take her to the
 corner. When the clerk left her at the street corner, she noticed that a
 man was following her. He followed her until she went into a boarding 
house, and then left. The next morning there were several policemen in 
front of the building, but none of them entered. When she left, however,
 they followed her from house to house until they lost sight of her. The
 police continued their search for several days, but could not find her.
 Eleanor said that she knew of their movements at all times, had looked 
in their faces several times, and had overheard several conversations 
about her and their plans to arrest her. But she was never detected. On 
16 June she left St. Louis on the first steamboat to Florence, Nebraska,
 and then joined a wagon train going to Salt Lake. 74
Arriving in Salt Lake, she stayed with the Pratt family 
and taught school. Brigham Young had called her to build a schoolhouse 
in which to teach the Pratt family. During the construction of the 
school, she wrote several letters to Brigham Young, and these are the 
principal source of the knowledge we have of her activities until her 
death in 1874. 75
 The building was begun in the latter part of 1857 and completed in 
1858. The other Pratt wives were slow enough in helping her financially 
that she had to borrow twenty dollars from Brigham Young to complete the
 structure. 76
 Most of the letters to Brigham Young reflect her dismay at the lack of 
support she was receiving from the Pratt family both before and after 
the school was completed. She wrote on 23 October 1858:
Bro Young,
Must I teach the Pratt children without any compensation? Or should I share like any other members of the P. P. Pratt family?
Certainly they have not contributed a mite to the 
building of the house neither have they rendered a mite of gratitude for
 my services, during the past years in instructing their children.
I have waded through toil and perplexity unknown to any 
second person to obtain a living and building the house agreeable to 
your instructions–and now I much desire your counsel as to the terms 
upon which I am to occupy the house. The women are not agreed and Parley
 [Jr.] declines deciding the matter. I believe your word would make an 
end of all strife in the case.
Your Sister in the Everlasting Covenant,
Eleanor Pratt 77
Eleanor Pratt 77
Brigham wrote back on 26 October:
Dear Sister:
Your note in regard to teaching Brother Pratt’s children
 is received. As regards the school house I suppose that it was 
principally built, by a freewill gift of the people, out of respect for 
Brother Parley and with a view of benefitting his Family.
So far as you identify your interest and means with the 
family and for their support, you should share equally with them 
according to your necessities.
Trusting that unity may pervade your councils and that the Lord will give you wisdom to see and do right
She did begin to share her means equally as Brigham 
directed, and the family allowed her to stay in the school, which became
 her home. Not only did she teach the Pratt children but also Brigham 
Young’s children and several other children of members of the Church. 79
 She was able to support herself on the tuition paid by her pupils, even
 though she received very little in tuition payments from the Pratt 
family, which created a hardship for her because even though she had 
enough to live on, that was about all she had, and repairs on the 
schoolhouse drew heavily on her funds. It appears that the Pratt family 
blamed her for Parley’s death and withheld their complete support from 
her.
On 30 April 1860 she met with George A. Smith and turned
 her handwritten account of the murder of Parley P. Pratt over to the 
Church. 80
 On 16 November 1860, Wilford Woodruff and Robert Campbell addressed the
 concluding session of a series of teachers’ meetings held in Eleanor’s 
schoolhouse. The major topic of the week-long meetings was education in 
Utah, and how to best teach the various subjects in the schools. The 
teachers presented papers on several topics and discussions were held on
 all aspects of teaching. Eleanor was a dedicated teacher and 
participated fully in the meetings in an attempt to improve her teaching
 ability. 81
 One example of her dedication may be cited. One of Parley’s sons, 
Teancum, had lost part of his foot to frostbite and required special 
care to insure his education. Eleanor wrote to Brigham Young:
I am now anxious to help in the education of Teancum. If
 my school is not decided the best place for him at present, I am ready 
to contribute the tuition of one pupil and also assist to clothe him, 
when I shall be free from debt contracted to improve the house last 
fall. 82
In 1862 Eleanor added two rooms to the schoolhouse to 
rent and proposed to clear a way for a playground for the school. That 
way she could accommodate some “brother or sister with a small place of 
business, in a convenient location, at a reasonable rent,” and at the 
same time create a small income for her to live on. 83
 The next thing that we learn about her comes from a 13 October 1866 
letter to Brigham Young. Writing very graphically, she relates what had 
happened to her since coming to Salt Lake after Parley’s death:
When I came from your Office in 1857 and told the family
 what you had given me to do one said, “I’m glad its not me.” Another “I
 wouldn’t like to do it.” And a third said “Eleanor are you going to do 
it?” Yes. “When do you intend to commence?” Tomorrow.
She then recounted to him how the construction of the 
school was accomplished by freewill offering and her expenditure and 
then said that the family had held a meeting and by unanimous vote 
refused her either the portion of a wife or 3/5 tuition pay for their 
children, when the schoolhouse was $200 in debt. She then continued:
Nevertheless the Lord blessed me and I have toiled 
through the years and the sons and daughters of Parley have been 
faithfully taught in the house built for that purpose and now a number 
of them are qualified to maintain themselves by teaching.
She then told Brigham that an old rumor was abounding in
 the vicinity that she had refused to teach the Pratt children until 
they paid tuition and this had been used to prejudice the minds of 
several against her. She affirmed that she had not refused them but had 
sought all manner of means to improve the building for their best good. 
She asked President Young to put aside this controversy by a word from 
him to the guilty parties. She informed him that she planned to leave 
town that winter with Abinadi, one of Parley and Belinda’s sons, to 
teach in the country. She said that plan met with Belinda’s approval and
 wished to know if Brigham would approve. 84
 We can only suppose that she did go through with her plan for we can 
find nothing further on what she did do in the winter of 1866.
In 1870 she was still teaching school at the Pratt schoolhouse and had Keziah, one of Parley’s wives, living with her. 85
 It seems from the 1870 Census Record of Utah that her youngest son, 
Albert, came to live with her, for he taught school for a time with her 
in the house. 86 What happened to her other children is still a mystery. Annie died on 9 September 1872. 87 We know nothing of Fitzroy, and we know little about Eleanor’s activities until her death at 8:00 p.m. on 24 October 1874. 88
Conclusion
These, then, are the details available concerning 
Eleanor Jane McComb McLean Pratt and Parley P. Pratt. Hector McLean 
apparently was a violent man, especially when he was under the influence
 of alcohol, which plagued him most of his life. When he had driven his 
wife from him and, in his mind at least, lost her to Mormonism, and was 
on the verge of losing his two youngest children he struck out at the 
man who stood for the Church and seemed to be the cause of his personal 
problems, convinced that by doing so he would rid the world of a social 
menace and a despicable man. He was totally unable to feel anything for 
his estranged wife’s or Parley’s religious beliefs.
***********
2. Parley P. Pratt Family Record,
 a genealogical record kept by Parley Pratt. The original, in Parley’s 
handwriting, is in the possession of Cathryn B. Pratt, Salt Lake City, 
Utah. Hereafter cited as Pratt Family Record.
3. New Orleans Probate Court. “In
 the matter of Eleanor Jane McComb wife of Hector H. McLean,” June 1857,
 Case #12018. A petition to the court for the arrest of Eleanor on the 
charged of insanity, filed by David McComb acting for Hector McLean.
4. Eleanor Pratt, sixty-two-page 
handwritten account of the murder of Parley P. Pratt, p. 60. Eleanor 
Pratt Papers, Church Archives, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day 
Saints. Hereafter cited as Eleanor Pratt, “Account.”
6. Ibid., p. 419. Reva Stanley, 
in the California Historical Quarterly (March 1935), p. 175, suggests 
that Parley met Eleanor sometime during his visit to San Francisco from 
11 July to 4 September 1851, prior to sailing for Valparaiso, Chile, on 5
 September 1851. Parley was also in the San Francisco area from 21 May 
to 30 July 1852 (see Autobiography of Parley P. Pratt, 6th ed. [Salt 
Lake City: Deseret Book, 1966], pp. 383-87, 404), and it is possible 
that Parley met her during that period. Both of these suggestions are 
countered by the following: “In July ’54 br. Pratt arrived here [San 
Francisco] from G. S. L. City, on a mission to the country. Up to this 
time Mrs. McLean had never seen br. Pratt; and he did not know that such
 a woman existed, although she had been a member nine months, and had 
been trying for two years to obtain her husband’s consent to it” 
(Western Standard, 10 July 1857). This quotation is from an article 
signed by a member of the Church who was in the San Francisco Branch 
when Parley and Eleanor met, and also prior to their meeting when 
Eleanor had problems with Hector in her attempt to obtain consent to 
join the Church. Eleanor substantiates the above with the following: “In
 the first place, the article alluded to says that `Mrs. McLean was 
induced to embrace the Mormon faith by Mr. Pratt’ [Arkansas 
Intelligencer, 15 May 1857]. This is false, for Mr. McLean knows that 
the first `Mormon’ sermon I heard in California, himself and my brother 
J. J. McComb, were present, and they know that it was at least two years
 before Mr. Pratt made his appearance in San Francisco; and they know 
that from the time I heard the first sermon I never spoke except in 
defence of the `Mormons’ and their faith; and they know that I sought 
diligently for my husbands consent to be baptized into the Church of the
 Saints, and finally obtained it in writing, and was baptized before P. 
P. Pratt made his appearance” (Millennial Star 19:428).
9. Nathan Tanner Journal, 24-26 
May 1854, Church Archives. Although Eleanor said that she had “embraced”
 the Mormon faith in November 1851, Tanner records that the baptism 
occurred on 24 May 1854: “Sister McClain was baptized & Sisters 
Evans & King, Sister Evans a little big also & I preached at 
Sister Evan’s house. May 25-56, 1854. . . . Sister Eleanor Jane McClain 
gave me one shirt and 3 hankichiefs. Her husband dos not belong to the 
Church & has forbid deen for the last two years [her] beying 
baptized untill now he gave his concent in writeing.” The Endowment 
House Record, 1855-56, also lists her baptism as May 1854.
15. John R. Young, “The Last 
Days of Parley P. Pratt,” Church Archives. A letter to William C. Black 
from John R. Young, March 1930. Also in the “Autobiography of John R. 
Young,” Church Archives, and William E. Berrett and Alma P. Burton, 
Readings in L. D. S. Church History (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 
1953), pp. 400-1.
18. New Orleans Passenger List, Genealogical Society Library, Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Salt Lake City, Utah.
20. Letter from Eleanor Mclean 
to Parley P. Pratt, 5 February 1855, Parley P. Pratt Papers, Church 
Archives. Hereafter cited as Pratt Papers.
22. New Orleans Passenger List, 13 February 1855, Genealogical Library, Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
26. Millennial Star 19:430. 
Eleanor seems to have been deeply fond of Parley for she says: “When he 
kept house with his wife, Elizabeth, in San Francisco, I often sought 
his society, and if any censure me, let them censure me for the 
strongest impulses of nature, which have ever prompted me to seek light 
and truth, despite the difficult that might intervene between me and the
 object of my search.”
27. Millennial Star 19:432. 
There is no doubt that Eleanor was not divorced from Hector at the time 
she was sealed to Parley on 14 November 1855. On 1 June 1857 when Hector
 filed a charge of insanity against his wife in New Orleans, he stated 
that he wanted her “placed under charge of your petitioner [Hector] as 
her curator.” All through the petition Eleanor was named as his wife. To
 further substantiate the above, when Eleanor was asked by a reporter of
 the New York World in 1869 whether she had divorced Hector prior to 
marrying Parley, she answered: “No, the sectarian priests have no power 
from God to marry; and as a so-called marriage ceremony performed by 
them is no marriage at all, no divorce was needed. The priesthood with 
its powers and privileges, can be found no where upon the face of the 
earth but in Utah. . . . I regard the laws of Celestial Marriage, or, as
 the “Gentiles” term it, polygamy, as the keystone of our religion. That
 is wherein we differ from the sects of the world. They hope for 
salvation in a heaven where husbands and wives shall be utter strangers 
to each other; we expect to reach a heaven where we shall rear families,
 the same as we do here. We could not do this unless we had a revelation
 authorizing Celestial Marriage; and we could not be saved in the 
Celestial Kingdom without obeying this revelation. It is the great 
distinctive feature of our religion, and by it our religion stands or 
falls” (New York World, 23 November 1869, p.2).
Eleanor’s explanation of why she joined in a polygamous marriage without going through the formalities of a sectarian divorce from Hector helps the modern reader better understand both the teaching about the authority of the priesthood, and the tenor of the time. For further discussions on the subject, see the following: Wilford Woodruff Journal, 15 August 1847, Church Archives; Orson Pratt, Speech on Marriage, Journal of Discourses, 16:175; Parley P. Pratt, Marriage and Morals in Utah (Liverpool: Orson Pratt, 1856); and Parley P. Pratt, Key to the Science of Theology (Liverpool: F. D. Richards, 1855), chapter 17.
Eleanor’s explanation of why she joined in a polygamous marriage without going through the formalities of a sectarian divorce from Hector helps the modern reader better understand both the teaching about the authority of the priesthood, and the tenor of the time. For further discussions on the subject, see the following: Wilford Woodruff Journal, 15 August 1847, Church Archives; Orson Pratt, Speech on Marriage, Journal of Discourses, 16:175; Parley P. Pratt, Marriage and Morals in Utah (Liverpool: Orson Pratt, 1856); and Parley P. Pratt, Key to the Science of Theology (Liverpool: F. D. Richards, 1855), chapter 17.
32. Pratt Journal, 24 January 
1856: “Jan. 24 The day in slayriding and visiting Bro. Keslar with five 
of my wives viz: Belinda, Elizabeth, Mary, Hannahette and Eleanor.” Reva
 Stanley, in Archer of Paradise (Caldwell, Idaho: Caxton Press, 1937), 
pp. 293-94, 296, didn’t rule out the possibility that Parley and Eleanor
 lived as a married couple, but favored the idea that the marriage was a
 Platonic gesture to provide Eleanor a husband in eternity. The evidence
 is not conclusive either way, except it was Parley’s habit to live with
 his wives.
35. John A. Peel, “Dying 
Remarks of Parley P. Pratt,” Church Archives. Peel was in Van Buren at 
the time of the murder, but his statement was not taken down by Frank 
Poneroy until 1895. See also Daily Missouri Democrat, 25 May 1857.
39. Letter from Parley P. Pratt to his wife Agatha, 25 February 1857, Steven Pratt Collection, typescript.
40.Samuel E. Allen, notarized statement sworn before Joseph W. Musser, 25 May 1857, Steven Pratt Collection, typescript.
43. George Higginson, “Account 
of the Assassination of Parley P. Pratt,” handwritten manuscript, Church
 Archives. All conversations between Pratt and Higginson are taken from 
this source.
44. Daily Missouri Democrat, 25
 May 1857. Following is a copy of one of the letters Hector found that 
led to his locating Parley and Eleanor. The letter was addressed “Mrs. 
Lucy R. Parker, by P. Pratt Parker, from near Fort Gibson, Cherokee 
nation,–dated 11 April 1857, as printed in the 25 May 1857 Daily 
Missouri Democrat:
Dear Eleanor,
McLean is in St. Louis; he has offered a reward for your discovery, or your children or me. The Apostates have betrayed me and you. I had to get away on foot, and leave all to save myself. If you come to Fort Gibson, you can hire a messenger and send him to Riley Perryman’s mill on the Arkansas River, twenty-five miles from Fort Gibson, and let him inquire for Washington N. Cook, mormon missionary, and when he has found him he will soon tell where elder-Pratt-Parker is. Do not let your children or any friend know that I am in this region, or anywhere else on the earth; except it is an elder from Texas who is in your confidence, and even him under strictest charge of keep you it.
“If you send a messenger to Perryman’s mill for Elder Cook in order to find me, send a note addressed to Washington N. Cook. Everybody knows the place. He may live a few miles distant, but the folks at Riley Perryman’s mill know where he is. And if they can be made sensible that it requires immediate action, some of them can go and find him. Your messenger can leave the note at Riley Perryman’s or with Elder George Burgess there and return, but you must state in the note where you can be found, and Elder Cook will probably call on you before he can have time to see me, as I may be some days journey away, for I don’t much expect you at Fort Gibson, as I don’t believe you received my last letter mailed at St. Louis, March 4th, and addressed as usual to the usual place. Elder Cook knows all, and you can trust him with all necessary information. When I know that you and the children are safe and your circumstances, I will know what to do.
“Be sure not to let the Texas company know anything, for all the frontiers are watched, and some of them may betray you there. I must hide you or pass you some other way.
“Pray much. Be still and wise. I have made use of some of the late alterations in the alphabet. I am well.
And your own ———- ———-.”
Dear Eleanor,
McLean is in St. Louis; he has offered a reward for your discovery, or your children or me. The Apostates have betrayed me and you. I had to get away on foot, and leave all to save myself. If you come to Fort Gibson, you can hire a messenger and send him to Riley Perryman’s mill on the Arkansas River, twenty-five miles from Fort Gibson, and let him inquire for Washington N. Cook, mormon missionary, and when he has found him he will soon tell where elder-Pratt-Parker is. Do not let your children or any friend know that I am in this region, or anywhere else on the earth; except it is an elder from Texas who is in your confidence, and even him under strictest charge of keep you it.
“If you send a messenger to Perryman’s mill for Elder Cook in order to find me, send a note addressed to Washington N. Cook. Everybody knows the place. He may live a few miles distant, but the folks at Riley Perryman’s mill know where he is. And if they can be made sensible that it requires immediate action, some of them can go and find him. Your messenger can leave the note at Riley Perryman’s or with Elder George Burgess there and return, but you must state in the note where you can be found, and Elder Cook will probably call on you before he can have time to see me, as I may be some days journey away, for I don’t much expect you at Fort Gibson, as I don’t believe you received my last letter mailed at St. Louis, March 4th, and addressed as usual to the usual place. Elder Cook knows all, and you can trust him with all necessary information. When I know that you and the children are safe and your circumstances, I will know what to do.
“Be sure not to let the Texas company know anything, for all the frontiers are watched, and some of them may betray you there. I must hide you or pass you some other way.
“Pray much. Be still and wise. I have made use of some of the late alterations in the alphabet. I am well.
And your own ———- ———-.”
63. Eleanor sent the following 
letter to Erastus Snow. The original is in the Erastus Snow Papers, 
Church Archives. This copy comes from the one Eleanor Pratt retained in 
her files, also in the Church Archives.
Dear Brother Snow,
I do not feel to have power to write you fully the painful news, you will find on the enclosed sheet. I therefore leave it open for your perusal.
Can you send for the body of Brother Parley. What shall I do? In case Mr. McLean either flees to evade arrest, or is taken into custody, my children will be without a protector!
I cannot wait to hear from you before I take some step, and I think I will go to N. O. and there I hope to hear from you. Adress to E. J. McComb care of J. S. McComb N. O.
Yours respectfully,
Eleanor
P. S.
If Brother Higinson is permitted to live and journey to you he can tell you alll things.
E. J.
The claim that the Church had deserted Parley Pratt by not taking his body to Utah for final burial needs to be placed in its proper perspective. There were a number of circumstances that arose to block any attempt to return Parley’s body as he had requested. First, the difficulty of transporting a body over the miles of wagon trail led the Saints to bury their dead where they died and move on, which is what they invariably did. Second, the news that Johnston’s Army had been sent to Utah precluded taking anything on the trains that did not absolutely have to be taken. Third, during the events of the Utah War there was no real opportunity to recover the body. Fourth, after the Mountain Meadow’s Massacre, the people of Van Buren, Arkansas refused to allow Mormons into their region until this century. All these did not deter later attempts as the following shows:
In 1902 Samuel Russell, Parley’s grandson, corresponded with John Neal, former mayor of Van Buren, and was informed that a Walter Fine knew the location of Parley’s grave. Russell wrote to the First Presidency asking what he should do. They recommended that he contact President J. G. Duffin of the Southwestern States Mission and request him to send some Elders to locate the grave “with the view of bringing his remains to this city [Salt Lake] for interment” (Letter from J. F. Smith, John R. Winder, and Anthon H. Lund to Samuel Russell, 19 May 1902, Church Archives). J. G. Duffin visited Van Buren on 3 September 1902 and contacted John Neal, former mayor, John Orme, Justice of the Peace at the time of Parley’s murder, and John Steward, the man who drove the wagon that transported Parley’s body to the gravesite. Brother Duffin did not visit the grave, but got a promise from John Steward and John Neal that they would assist in the removal of the body if the exact location of the burial place could be determined. They informed Duffin that the Fine brothers could point out the exact location. He was not able to visit them. (James G. Duffin to Anthon H. Lund, 19 December 1902, and Journal History of the Church, 13 May 1857)
Further investigation was done in 1912 by Samuel Russell. He visited Van Buren and talked with Thomas Fine, who pointed out what he thought was the location of the grave. After Elder Russell had returned to Salt Lake, he sent a letter to his friend, Calvin Little, of Alma, Arkansas, on 17 November 1912, and asked him to investigate further. Little sent Russell a memorandum giving the location of the graveyard and the approximate location of the grave, which was in the northeast part of the graveyard near a large oak stump–he could not determine the exact location. (Samuel Russell Papers, Church Archives. The Little Memorandum is a letter from A.B. Howell to Calvin Little, dated 11 August 1912. Little must have gotten the memorandum after Russell left, and sent it to him later in the November letter.) See footnote 63B.
Dear Brother Snow,
I do not feel to have power to write you fully the painful news, you will find on the enclosed sheet. I therefore leave it open for your perusal.
Can you send for the body of Brother Parley. What shall I do? In case Mr. McLean either flees to evade arrest, or is taken into custody, my children will be without a protector!
I cannot wait to hear from you before I take some step, and I think I will go to N. O. and there I hope to hear from you. Adress to E. J. McComb care of J. S. McComb N. O.
Yours respectfully,
Eleanor
P. S.
If Brother Higinson is permitted to live and journey to you he can tell you alll things.
E. J.
The claim that the Church had deserted Parley Pratt by not taking his body to Utah for final burial needs to be placed in its proper perspective. There were a number of circumstances that arose to block any attempt to return Parley’s body as he had requested. First, the difficulty of transporting a body over the miles of wagon trail led the Saints to bury their dead where they died and move on, which is what they invariably did. Second, the news that Johnston’s Army had been sent to Utah precluded taking anything on the trains that did not absolutely have to be taken. Third, during the events of the Utah War there was no real opportunity to recover the body. Fourth, after the Mountain Meadow’s Massacre, the people of Van Buren, Arkansas refused to allow Mormons into their region until this century. All these did not deter later attempts as the following shows:
In 1902 Samuel Russell, Parley’s grandson, corresponded with John Neal, former mayor of Van Buren, and was informed that a Walter Fine knew the location of Parley’s grave. Russell wrote to the First Presidency asking what he should do. They recommended that he contact President J. G. Duffin of the Southwestern States Mission and request him to send some Elders to locate the grave “with the view of bringing his remains to this city [Salt Lake] for interment” (Letter from J. F. Smith, John R. Winder, and Anthon H. Lund to Samuel Russell, 19 May 1902, Church Archives). J. G. Duffin visited Van Buren on 3 September 1902 and contacted John Neal, former mayor, John Orme, Justice of the Peace at the time of Parley’s murder, and John Steward, the man who drove the wagon that transported Parley’s body to the gravesite. Brother Duffin did not visit the grave, but got a promise from John Steward and John Neal that they would assist in the removal of the body if the exact location of the burial place could be determined. They informed Duffin that the Fine brothers could point out the exact location. He was not able to visit them. (James G. Duffin to Anthon H. Lund, 19 December 1902, and Journal History of the Church, 13 May 1857)
Further investigation was done in 1912 by Samuel Russell. He visited Van Buren and talked with Thomas Fine, who pointed out what he thought was the location of the grave. After Elder Russell had returned to Salt Lake, he sent a letter to his friend, Calvin Little, of Alma, Arkansas, on 17 November 1912, and asked him to investigate further. Little sent Russell a memorandum giving the location of the graveyard and the approximate location of the grave, which was in the northeast part of the graveyard near a large oak stump–he could not determine the exact location. (Samuel Russell Papers, Church Archives. The Little Memorandum is a letter from A.B. Howell to Calvin Little, dated 11 August 1912. Little must have gotten the memorandum after Russell left, and sent it to him later in the November letter.) See footnote 63B.
69. List of the contributions 
by the people of Van Buren to Judge Ogden to pay Eleanor’s expenses to 
New Orleans, Eleanor Pratt Papers, Church Archives.
71. Ibid., pp. 42-43. For a copy of the article, see Arkansas Intelligencer, 22 May 1857 and Millennial Star 19:428-32.
75. Letters from 1858-1866 from
 Eleanor Pratt to Brigham Young, Brigham Young Correspondence, Church 
Archives. Stanley Hirshson in Lion of the Lord: A Biography of Brigham 
Young (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1969), p. 217, quotes a Captain Ginn, 
who visited Utah, that Eleanor was a concubine of Brigham Young. I could
 find nothing to substantiate this claim, and in fact, her letters to 
Brigham suggest that she was not married to him. The Endowment House 
Record from 1858-1874 shows no sealing taking place between Brigham and 
Eleanor. Eleanor was a frequent visitor to the Young house, because she 
taught Brigham’s children.
78. Letter from Brigham Young to Eleanor Pratt, 26 October 1858, Brigham Young Letter Book, Church Archives.
So many problems for Horace, Parley, and Elenor and their family could have been solved if all of them had humbleness and charity. (I am not saying Parley wasn't humble.) None of us are perfect, and each of us comes to earth with weaknesses, which means there will be at least one commandment or habit of the natural man or woman that will butt forces with God's laws and commandments, which provide safety. If Horace had been humble he would have seen the power the gospel and the atonement of Christ would have given him for his drinking or whatever need caused him to feel like he had to drink to mask his pain or whatever. Horace, while investigating the church/ and after joining the church would have talked to his Bishop, and also his wife. They would have been cheerleaders for him in his weakness. At the same time, his wife and children would have been protected from him in a way that didn't increase the vicious cycle, or make him feel abandoned or his reputation ruined. This is what I think would happen in charitable society. There is accountability, but there is creativity, protection, and a good will from all. Elenor's needs would have been met, Horace's needs, their children's, and anybody else involved in the picture, to help them through it. But when there is pride (Horace's actions, Elenor's father's actions, maybe even some of Elenor's actions) and fear (Horace's emotions, and Elenor's father's), then it is hard for the spirit to work, and a new situation occurred due to pride and fear and sin. Charity, love, forgiveness, being teachable, would have all been ingredients to lead to a more creative solution and not such a tragic ending. I think the Lord has ways to help people solve problems, that we would call thinking outside the box, but the world tries to sabotage all good things.
ReplyDeleteI was reading D&C 67:10 today....
ReplyDelete10 And again, verily I say unto you that it is your privilege, and a promise I give unto you that have been ordained unto this ministry, that inasmuch as you strip yourselves from jealousies and fears, and humble yourselves before me, for ye are not sufficiently humble, the veil shall be rent and you shall see me and know that I am—not with the carnal neither natural mind, but with the spiritual."
What are some ways that you strip yourself of jealousies and fears and humble yourself? I know God can also help us. But where does God's part end and our part begin? What things can we do and become that help this process of stripping away jealousies and fears? What things has God done for you that have helped you in this process. I think this has become one of my new favorite scriptures for the time being.
Thank you for reposting this. Parley is my great-great-great grandfather, and I'd only known the most rudimentary details of his death.
ReplyDeleteWhat a great man he was! and what a rough life Eleanor had both before and after.