I was looking at the supposed Russian satellite evidence that shows MH17 being fired on by a Russian-made jet. There is enough detail to show the airplane they used for their photoshop fakery. It shows over-wing exits and a shorter fuselage (not the length of a 777-300ER). Sorry, folks but the 777-200 was not certified with an over-wing exit. This most likely is a 767 with the over-wing exit markings, as shown. A traditional full-size over-wing door adds an incredible amount of weight to an airplane because all of the flight loads have to be transmitted from the wing into the fuselage via the skin. When you make a hole of that size in the skin, the load path must circumvent that massive cutout, so the loads become concentrated (especially at the corners of the cutout). The skin there can be 10-20 times the normal skin thickness due to stress concentrations there. So, if at all possible, the overwing doors are avoided. In the case of the 767 or 737, smaller hatches about the width of a human body are used to get the passengers out. These typically come in pairs and are somewhat effective unless people panic and then the bodies tend to pile up inside and they asphyxiate from the smoke and die before they are roasted by the actual flames (gross, eh?) in a crash and burn scenario.
Also, I did not see evidence of a flaperon that was a relatively new development on the 777 that was not on the older 767 and other wide-bodies of that era. The flaperon is a hybrid flight control surface that works as both an inboard aileron and a trailing edge flap. It sits directly behind the engine and moves within the thrust stream doing a lion-share of the roll/anti-roll work on the 777. Traditionally, the ailerons are located further outboard on the wing, and this distance from the roll axis produces a lag in roll/anti-roll response and needlessly stresses the outboard wing structure. The inboard aileron reduces these problems considerably. The outboard ailerons on the 777 are still used for secondary response and for fly-by-cable if the fly-by-wire system is not functional due to power outages or loss of hydraulics that would normally power the flaperon. That flight control is a high input "hydraulic hog" - so an alternate system was needed, probably for ETOPS certification. The flaperon is also used as a flap on landing and operates as a high-lift device with the rest of the trailing edge system one the flaps are extended on landing and takeoff. It's function as an inboard aileron is still active in that mode, doing double duty until the trailing edge system is stowed/faired for the cruise portion of the flight. So, the Ruskies screwed up on that one. Not only was their photoshopping bad, they did not make a very good case in the international media. Like Hitler proved, you can sell the public on any lie, you just have to have complete control over the media in order to do it. Here in Amerika, they have nearly got complete control of the media, excepting the internet - which is why they are attempting to control it. During the rioting in Cairo during the Arab uprising, they were able to hit the internet "kill switch" there in Cairo and shut down the ability of the protesters to communicate. This is why bummer now has controlled that via EO and other means. Now, they are trying to turn it all over to the UN for ultimate world-wide control so that the new leader can do it seamlessly on a world scale. How convenient for them....... These traitors will all hang.
When you are getting ready to basically take over the world, you need your disinformation outlets in place so you can placate/misinform the people who might otherwise rise up. Spencer mentioned the lack of good/reliable news available after the takeover by the Russians/Chinese. For the conqueror, this is a key requirement.
Here is the article that got me "spun down" on this development:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/nov/16/sputnik-launched-by-russia-to-silence-dissent-comb/
No comments:
Post a Comment