THIS BLOG ATTEMPTS TO SHOW HOW SCIENCE IS CATCHING UP WITH REVEALED RELIGION

THIS BLOG IS AN ATTEMPT TO PUT ALL THE COOL STUFF THAT I BUMP INTO ABOUT THE SECOND COMING OF CHRIST AND EVENTS THAT LEAD UP TO IT INTO ONE LOCATION.
THE CONTENTS WILL BE FROM AN LDS PERSPECTIVE. IF YOU DISAGREE WITH ANYTHING IN HERE, I DO NOT PARTICULARLY CARE TO ARGUE, UNLESS YOU CAN ADD TO THIS BODY OF WORK. I HAVE AN OPEN MIND, THAT IS WHY I READ STUFF FROM ALL DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVES AND SEEK LEARNING FROM THE BEST BOOKS. I JUST AM NOT HERE TO ARGUE ABOUT IT - BUT TO PUT IT OUT THERE WHERE OTHERS CAN PERUSE/PURSUE IT. I TAKE PARTICULAR INTEREST IN HONEST SEEKERS OF TRUTH AND BELIEVE THAT SCIENCE IS REVEALED RELIGION'S BEST ALLY. YOU WILL SEE ALOT OF TOPICS IN THIS BLOG THAT SHOW SCIENCE BACKING - AND SLOWLY CATCHING UP WITH - REVEALED RELIGION.
ENJOY!!

Sunday, December 7, 2014

LIFE ON THE KIBBUTZ, MARXISM AND THE LAW OF CONSECRATION

It is fascinating to read this wiki article on the inner workings of kibbutz.  Through the various experiments that were carried out over in Israel, we can learn what things did/did not work and learn much about why our own attempts at consecration have not been successful.

Lessons learned from that will help ease the transition into the Millennial model of Consecration.

It WILL be implemented, if only by force of circumstance (and not direct force).  Times will  be interesting, here shortly:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kibbutz

1 comment:

  1. The kibbutz works on the principle of communalism, or communism. This is not the same as the Millennial mode of consecration.
    J. Reuben Clark and Marion G. Romney -- both of whom were in the LDS church's First Presidency at different times-- both studied the principle extensively. Here is one thing Elder Clark clarified:
    "President J. Reuben Clark Jr. explained: “The fundamental principle of this system was the private ownership of property. Each man owned his portion, or inheritance, or stewardship, with an absolute title, which he could alienate, or hypothecate, or otherwise treat as his own. The Church did not own all of the property, and the life under the United Order was not a communal life. … The United Order is an individualistic system, not a communal system.” (In Conference Report, Oct. 1942, p. 57.)

    Also see this link: https://www.lds.org/manual/doctrine-and-covenants-student-manual/section-50-59/section-51-bishop-edward-partridge-and-the-law-of-consecration?lang=eng
    And Appendix L of the same manual.

    ReplyDelete