EFFECTS OF MERCURY ON SEXUALITY AND REPRODUCTION

This is VERY disturbing to me.

I have always suspected that something was up with the fluoridation of our water and the use of methylmercury/thimerisol in my childrens' vaccinations.

Fluoridation was used in the German concentration camps to pacify the inmates and we all know that after living a self-destructive and often disease-riddled lifestyle in which the average lifespan is 57 (for males) as opposed to 72 for the general male population, that a certain demographic is looking for a few good recruits to keep their "prospects" fresh (I am throwing up about now)....

So read this and draw some conclusions - maybe the same ones that I am drawing as I document the moral decline and slide into the abyss that America has embarked on. I am not a medical expert by any stretch of the imagination, but some things just never have felt right - like mercury in something that every kid is basically forced to take. Mercury and lead in the old amalgam fillings was the best material that they had at the time (other than expensive gold) for fillings; but mercury in the kids' vaccines......hmmmmm Sometimes, when something doesn't add up, there is a clear reason. Truth be told, the reason why the sexual perversion movement has taken hold and been forced down good peoples' throats is because a majority of (the corrupt) people now in power (at the top) are of that persuasion because they serve a different master. I can think of Senator Craig and the list goes on and on. I just have a gut feel, and I think I will be proven right over time. When we see a few slip ups by people in power - when the carefully manipulated veneer peels off, we are repulsed and shocked. The reality is, a majority of those that move in the elite circles at the top are embroiled in that kind of stuff - and that is how secrets are so tightly held in the inner circle. Threat of being revealed by others as to who they really are.
Sometime I will do a dark piece on what little I know that has come to light out of darkness. Those that have pierced that shroud of secrecy have a frightening tale to tell indeed. The devil truly is the the god of this world for the time being and he and his fallen angels rejoice. This is why I yearn for the Lord's return - so that the trash that seeks to destroy what is good and right will be put in its rightful place, that good may flourish and that truth will prevail once again in this great land:

Pollution 'makes male birds mate with each other', say scientists

By Daily Mail Reporter
Last updated at 2:00 AM on 2nd December 2010


Water pollution is posing a threat to bird ­populations by causing males to mate with each other.

Scientists believe poisonous metal compounds entering the food chain can affect sexuality, causing a reduction in offspring.

They found that even relatively low levels of methylmercury in the diet of male white ibises caused the birds to pair up with each other, snubbing females.
Close bond: The white Ibis is one of the birds that is being badly affected by mercury in its diet, new research has shown

Close bond: The white Ibis is one of the birds that is being badly affected by mercury in its diet, new research has shown

As a result fewer females breed and fewer chicks are produced.

Methylmercury is a form of mercury – the metal which is liquid at room temperature and is better known as quicksilver. It has been seeping into groundwater from ­industry for years.

This is the first scientific study to show how the pollutant appears to alter sexual preference.

U.S. researcher Peter Frederick ­captured 160 young white ibises – a coastal wading bird – and gave them food laced with methylmercury.

The birds were split into four groups. One group ate food with 0.3  parts per ­million (ppm) methylmercury, which most U.S. states would regard as too high for human consumption.

A second group was fed 0.1 ppm, and the third 0.05 ppm, a low dose that wild birds would be exposed to frequently. The fourth group received food clear of the poison.

All three dosed groups had significantly more homosexual males than the control group. Male-male pairs courted, built nests together and paired off for several weeks.

Higher doses increased the effect, with 55 per cent of males in the 0.3 ppm group affected.

Overall, male-male mating was blamed for 81 per cent of unproductive nests in the dosed groups.

‘We knew mercury could depress their testosterone levels,’ explained Dr Frederick.

‘But we didn’t expect this. In the worst-case scenario, the production of young would fall by 50 per cent.’ Other birds would probably be similarly affected, he said.

However, Dr Frederick, of the Florida University, and fellow researcher Nilmini Jayasena, of the Peradeniya University, Sri Lanka, admitted it was far from clear if methylmercury could be linked to similar effects in mammals.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1334725/Mercury-diet-making-male-birds-gay.html#ixzz170uztRbK

AND THEY WERE MARRYING AND GIVING IN MARRIAGE - A PRELUDE TO DESTRUCTION

My daughter found this and I thought it was instantly recognizable as something we should all be aware of:

BY JANET PORTER

How same-sex marriage points to end of the world
Posted: May 20, 2008
1:00 am Eastern

© 2010

What do May 17, 2004, and May 15, 2008, have in common? One judge and a redefinition of marriage against the will of the people.

Both the Massachusetts Superior Court and the California Supreme Court by a one-judge margin redefined what marriage has always been in every culture and every religion for more than 5,000 years of recorded history.

Why does this matter?

As I wrote about in my book, "The Criminalization of Christianity," Jeffrey Satinover, who holds an M.D. from Princeton and doctorates from Yale, MIT and Harvard, was on my radio program one day and I asked him about where we are in history. He explained that according to the "Babylonian Talmud" – the book of rabbis' interpretation of the scriptures 1,000 years before Christ, there was only one time in history that reflects where we are right now. There was only one time in history, according to these writings, where men were given in marriage to men, and women given in marriage to women.


Want to venture a guess as to when? No, it wasn't in Sodom and Gomorrah, although that was my guess. Homosexuality was rampant there, of course, but according to the Talmud, not homosexual "marriage." What about ancient Greece? Rome? No. Babylon? No again. The one time in history when homosexual "marriage" was practiced was … during the days of Noah. And according to Satinover, that's what the "Babylonian Talmud" attributes as the final straw that led to the Flood.

On my Faith2Action radio program on Thursday, Rabbi Aryeh Spero verified this to be true.

Rabbi Spero spoke of God's compassion before the Flood, in hopes people would repent and turn back to His ways. He showed patience for hundreds of years.

But, he said, the Talmud's writings reveal that "before the Flood people started to write marriage contracts between men, in other words, homosexual 'marriage,' which is more than homosexual activity – it's giving an official state stamp of approval, a sanctification … of homosexual partnership."

In fact, he said, "the writings indicated that it wasn't even so much the 'straw that broke the camel's back,' but that the sin in and of itself is so contrary to why God created the world, so contrary to the order of God's nature, that God said then and there 'I have to start all over … to annihilate the world and start from the beginning. …'"

Rabbi Spero went on to say, "Even in ancient Greece they did not write marriage contracts between men. There was homosexuality, and it was wrong, but there was not an official 'blessed' policy. … Marriage is 'sanctification' (not simply a partnership)." He said to confer the title of sanctification and holiness upon this behavior is "probably one of the greatest sins of all that one does against God's plan for this world."

The one time it happened was: "During the days of Noah." When I first heard this, my mind immediately went to a verse I've heard many times but never with such relevance. The verse is found in Matthew 24:37. It reads:

As it was in the days of Noah, so it will be at the coming of the Son of Man. – Mathew 24:37 (NIV)

I used to read this verse and think: It was bad at lots of points in history; it doesn't necessarily mean now, but if these Jewish writings are true, we are uniquely like the "days of Noah" right now – and only right now.

But it can't be yet, you say. You have a lot going on in your life? You're getting married? Here's how the New Living Translation describes that very sentiment in Luke:

When the Son of Man returns, the world will be like the people were in Noah's day. In those days before the Flood, the people enjoyed banquets and parties and weddings right up to the time Noah entered his boat, and the flood came to destroy them all. – Luke 17:26-27

Happily going about as if everything was fine was what they did, too.

You don't like this possibility? Don't even believe in the Flood? Doesn't matter. Some things are true whether you believe them or not. How can you be sure? There's a way. Did you know that about one-fourth of the Bible is prophecy? A quarter of the Bible is a lot – it's a big book. And did you know God's standard? Perfection. That means that if even one of those prophecies is wrong, you can discount the whole thing. Kind of like a prophet who makes a false prediction – that made him a false prophet and a candidate for stoning. Did you know that 4,000 prophecies in that Bible have already come true down to the last detail? That leaves about 1,000 left to be fulfilled – those are the ones regarding the last days before the return of Christ, which are being checked off the list right now.

If 4,000 out of 5,000 prophecies have already occurred exactly as the Bible predicted they would, you might want to pay attention to the rest.

The good news is that 1.1 million people across California have signed a petition to bring marriage to a vote of the people through a state constitutional amendment (just like 27 other states have done). And guess what? An amendment to a state constitution trumps even the most out-of-control state judiciary. We'll likely know if these signatures are validated before this tyrannical ruling goes into effect, and I predict they will be since they gathered 400,000 more signatures more than they needed to qualify. Besides, they already voted – eight years ago where more than 61 percent of Californians declared marriage as the union of a man and a woman. Now they just need to turn that same language into a constitutional amendment.

I don't live in California, so why am I sounding the alarm? Here's why:

But if the watchman sees the sword coming and does not blow the trumpet, and the people are not warned, and the sword comes and takes any person from among them, he is taken away in his iniquity; but his blood I will require at the watchman's hand. – Ezekiel 33:6

I'm praying and working to protect marriage in California (and the rest of the country) not only because I care about marriage, but because I care about civilization. And, if we obey God, he just may spare us from the judgment we deserve.

May heaven help this nation....

ATTEMPTS BY GAY ACTIVISTS TO UNDERMINE MY MOST SACRED RELIGIOUS RITE - MARRIAGE

MY OBJECT IN THIS BLOG IS NOT TO MAKE IT A POLITICAL BLOG - SO DO NOT TAKE IT AS SUCH. THE ATTACK ON THE MORAL MAJORITY BY A GROUP LESS THAN 5% OF THE POPULATION IS FAR MORE A MORAL ISSUE THAN A POLITICAL ONE. MY RELIGION DOES NOT EXPRESSLY SUPPORT POLITICAL CANDIDATES OR PARTIES BUT HAS ALWAYS RESERVED THE RIGHT TO SPEAK OUT CLEARLY ON MORAL ISSUES AND THUS MAINTAIN OUR CHARITABLE STATUS. ANYONE WHO TRIES TO DENY ME THIS RIGHT HAS CLEARLY CROSSED A LINE AND WILL BE DEALT WITH DECISIVELY.

BELOW IS A GREAT ARTICLE EXPLAINING THE LDS POSITION ON PROP 8 FOR WHICH I EXPECT TO TAKE SOME HEAT AS A SO-CALLED "BIGOT". THE FACTS ARE BELOW. WE ARE JUST THE LITTLE GUY (2% OF CALIFORNIA'S POPULATION) SO WE TAKE THE MOST HEAT BY THE 5% (WHO IS BEATING UP ON WHO?). CALL RIGHTS TO SEE A 'LOVED ONE' IN THE HOSPITAL SOMETHING ELSE AND YOU HAVE NO FIGHT. CALL IT MARRIAGE AND FURTHER IMPINGE ON A SACRED ETERNAL ORDINANCE OF MINE AND YOU WILL HAVE A FIGHT ON YOUR HANDS - SOMETHING YOU CANNOT EVEN IMAGINE. YOU MIGHT AS WELL TRY AND TAKE MY KIDS OUT OF MY GRASP AS ATTEMPT TO ASSAULT THAT PRINCIPLE WITHOUT A FIGHT. FIRST A WAR OF WORDS - THEN SOMETHING SIMILAR TO WHAT HAPPENED WHEN A SMALL GROUP OF FOLKS IN THE SOUTH TRIED TO IMPOSE THEIR VALUE SET ON THE MORAL MAJORITY IN THE NORTH....

WE WERE DRIVEN AND SCOURGED OVER OUR 'IMMORAL' AND 'GROSS' STANCE ON POLYGAMY IN THE LATE 1800'S. WE WERE STRIPPED OF ALL OUR RIGHTS BECAUSE WE WERE NOT MORALLY ON THE 'INSIDE' - BECAUSE WE DID NOT BELIEVE IN THE STAUNCH IDEA OF JUST ONE MAN AND ONE WOMAN. NOW WE ARE CALLED IMMORAL YET AGAIN PRECISELY BECAUSE WE FIND COURAGE TO CLEARLY STATE THAT MARRIAGE IS DEFINE PRECISELY AS BETWEEN ONE MAN AND ONE WOMAN.

WHAT INSANE CHAPTER WE EMBARK UPON. DO NOT CROSS LINES. THE RESULTS WILL BE CATASTROPHIC FOR THIS NATION AND PEOPLE THAT DEFIES GOD'S WAYS - YES, NOT THE MORMON'S WAYS, BUT GOD'S WAYS.

Thanks to Phil Wasden for sending this letter.

“In the aftermath of the recent election, we may find ourselves oddly on the defensive regarding our support for the Yes on Proposition 8 cause. Our young people have been especially subject to mean spirited comments by high school friends and teachers. We have nothing to be ashamed of. We did nothing wrong. In fact, we did everything that a civic minded American can and should do. I have put together a few facts that help me to appreciate our position better. For example:

Latter-Day Saints make up less than 2% of the population of California. There are approximately 800,000 LDS out of a total population of approximately 34 million.

Latter-Day Saints voters were less than 5% of the yes vote. If one estimates that 250,000 LDS are registered voters (the rest being children), then LDS voters made up 4.6% of the Yes vote and 2.4% of the total Proposition 8 vote.

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Mormons) donated no money to the Yes on 8 campaign. Individual members of the Church were encouraged to support the Yes on 8 efforts and, exercising their constitutional right to free speech, donated whatever they felt like donating.

The No on 8 campaign raised more money than the Yes on 8 campaign. Unofficial estimates put No on 8 at $38 million and Yes on 8 at $32 million, making it the most expensive non-presidential election in the country.

Advertising messages for the Yes on 8 campaign are based on case law and real-life situations. The No on 8 supporters have insisted that the Yes on 8 messaging is based on lies. Every Yes on 8 claim is supported.

The majority of our friends and neighbors voted Yes on 8. Los Angeles County voted in favor of Yes on 8. Ventura County voted in favor of Yes on 8.

African Americans overwhelmingly supported Yes on 8. Exit polls show that 70% of Black voters chose Yes on 8. This was interesting because the majority of these voters voted for President-elect Obama. No on 8 supporters had assumed that Obama voters would vote No on 8.

The majority of Latino voters voted Yes on 8. Exit polls show that the majority of Latinos supported Yes on 8 and cited religious beliefs (assumed to be primarily Catholic).

The Yes on 8 coalition was a broad spectrum of religious organizations. Catholics, Evangelicals, Protestants, Orthodox Jews, and Muslims – all supported Yes on 8. It is estimated that there are 10 million Catholics and 10 million Protestants in California. Latter-Day Saints were a tiny fraction of the population represented by Yes on 8 coalition members.

Not all Latter-Day Saints voted in favor of Proposition 8. Our faith accords that each person be allowed to choose for him or herself. Church leaders have asked members to treat other members with "civility, respect and love," despite their differing views.

The Church did not violate the principal of separation of church and state. This principle is derived from the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, which reads, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof . . ." The phrase "separation of church and state", which does not appear in the Constitution itself, is generally traced to an 1802 letter by Thomas Jefferson, although it has since been quoted in several opinions handed down by the United States Supreme Court in recent years. The LDS Church is under no obligation to refrain from participating in the political process, to the extent permitted by law. U.S. election law is very clear that Churches may not endorse candidates, but may support issues. The Church has always been very careful on this matter and occasionally (not often) chooses to support causes that it feels to be of a moral nature.

Supporters of Proposition 8 did exactly what the Constitution provides for all citizens: they exercised their First Amendment rights to speak out on an issue that concerned them, make contributions to a cause that they support, and then vote in the regular electoral process. For the most part, this seems to have been done in an open, fair, and civil way. Opponents of 8 have accused supporters of being bigots, liars, and worse. The fact is, we simply did what Americans do – we spoke up, we campaigned, and we voted.

Hold your heads up high – you did a great job on this most important cause. We will have more opportunities in the future to participate in our democratic process. Let's remember the lessons learned and do an even better job next time.

These are my personal opinions and thoughts; any errors are mine and in no way reflect official Church policy or doctrine.”

Thanks,
Kevin Hamilton

LINK OF MANY CANCERS TO STD VIRUSES

As a committed germ freak and believer in committed monogamous relationships and the law of chastity, this is one of my babies.

I have been wanting to make this post for quite some time as part of my "Chastity Makes Sense" diatribe. It would seem that most (60%) of the cancers out there can be caused by STDs or violations of the Word of Wisdom (Doctrine and Covenants, Section 89):

Here is the first link from THROAT CANCER to oral sex and HPV.

There is much more to come so check back over time. This is definitely a work in progress.