I have heard breathings that this may well be scripted as a false flag:
This document was published in April and has only been made public since the Ferguson escalation has been happening.
If
you read the last provisions below, You'll see that in MO they are
progressing through local, county, state, national guard to control the
situation to finally invoke martial law.
U.S. Army Techniques Publication 3-39.33: Civil Disturbances
April 2014
WEB PAGE (Summary): [link to publicintelligence.net (secure)]
PDF FILE (Full Document): [link to info.publicintelligence.net]
Click Here to View the Escalation of LETHAL RESPONSE Chart: [link to publicintelligence.net (secure)]
Click Here to View the Escalation of TRAUMA Chart: [link to publicintelligence.net (secure)]
ATP
3-39.33 provides discussion and techniques about civil disturbances and
crowd control operations that occur in the continental United States
(CONUS) and outside the continental United States (OCONUS). ...
CIVIL UNREST
1-1.
Demonstrations, public disorder, and riots happen for a number of
reasons. Some of these reasons are economic hardships, social
injustices, ethnic differences (leading to oppression), objections to
world organizations or certain governments, political grievances,
terrorist acts, other man-made disasters, and natural disasters. Civil
unrest is when a civil society or a segment of its population is in a
disturbed or uneasy state or in turmoil. ...
1-2. ... In the
United States, this fundamental right is protected under the
Constitution of the United States, while other countries have various
laws that protect the rights of their citizens rights. During unified
action, U.S. forces should never violate basic civil or human rights.
Most protesters are law-abiding citizens who intend to keep their
protests nonviolent, but some protest planners insist that the event
involve violence. Often in the media, protesters can gain sympathy for
their cause by prompting authorities to take physical action against
them. Violence can be the result of demonstrators beginning to conduct
unlawful or criminal acts and authorities (who are responsible for the safety and welfare of all) enforcing the laws of the municipality, state, or nation. The
level of violence is determined by the willingness of demonstrators to
display and voice their opinions in support of their cause and the
actions and reactions of the control force on scene.
...
1-6.
Terrorist organizations may infiltrate groups within a demonstrating
crowd. These terrorist groups may intend to embarrass their government
or other governments. Terrorist infiltrators can be used to provoke
crowds as a diversion, as part of a demonstration, or as cover for
terrorist acts.
THREAT ANALYSIS AND CROWD ASSESSMENT
...
What
are the possible targets of violence? Riot participants, in particular,
may focus on target facilities, personnel, or objects. There is no set
target list for rioters, and it depends on the location and what is in
the area. Some common targets include: authority figures (the control
force), government facilities, food supply facilities, gun stores,
retail stores (especially those with high value items), and symbols of
authority or government (such as statues, flags, or signs).
...
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS
2-3.
Commanders must know the legal boundaries, their sources, and how they
apply to interacting with civilians in OCONUS and CONUS. The staff judge
advocate (SJA) office is able to assist with information as well. The
SJA office should be included in planning and involved in any activity
with potential legal implications. For civil disturbance missions there
are differences in the legal boundaries, and in how U.S. federal forces
can be utilized, depending on if the event is within the United States
or within a foreign country. The planning and execution for these
missions needs to be conducted within those legal parameters.
Continental United States Versus Outside the Continental United States
2-4.
For the U.S. Army, conducting civil disturbance missions within the
United States. will vary greatly when compared to conducting civil
disturbance missions within a foreign country where the U.S. Army is
conducting operations. Except as expressly authorized by the
Constitution of the United States or by another act of Congress, the
Posse Comitatus Act (18 USC 1385) prohibits the use of the Active Army
as enforcement officials to execute state or federal law and perform
direct law enforcement functions within CONUS. For OCONUS
operations, especially when the HN does not have a legitimate government
or law enforcement capabilities, the U.S. Army may have to perform
these functions, including responding to civil disturbances and
performing the tactics and techniques discussed in this manual.
...
2-6. Within
CONUS, military operations would fall under the defense support of
civil authorities (see ADP 3-28 and ADRP 3-28). Military support to law
enforcement is one of two categories: direct and indirect support. When
authorized by the Secretary of Defense, federal military forces may
provide indirect support to law enforcement agencies; but support is
limited to logistical, transportation, and training assistance except
when emergency authority applies. State and territorial governors can
use state National Guard forces for direct support to civilian law
enforcement; however, such use is a temporary expedient and must be in
accordance with state laws (see ADP 3-28).
2-7. The
Constitution of the United States, laws, regulations, policies, and
other legal issues limit the use of federal military personnel in
domestic support operations. Any Army involvement in civil disturbance
operations involves many legal issues requiring comprehensive legal
reviews. However, federal forces are authorized for
use in civil disturbance operations under certain circumstances. The
following references pertain to the use of federal forces within the
United States, therefore; commanders, staffs, and leaders must be
familiar with, and adhere to, the parameters within them—
Insurrection Act (10 USC 333–334).
Posse Comitatus Act (18 USC 1385).
32 CFR, Part 215.
AR 381-10.
DODD 3025.18.
DODI 3025.21.
NGR 500-1.
2-8. The
Constitution of the United States provides two exceptions for which the
Posse Comitatus Act does not apply. These exceptions are based upon the
inherent right of the U.S. government to ensure the preservation of
public order and to carrying out governmental operations within its
territorial limits by force, if necessary. These two exceptions are—
Emergency
authority. A sudden and unexpected civil disturbance, disaster, or
calamity may seriously endanger life and property and disrupt normal
governmental functions to such an extent that local authorities cannot
control the situation. At such times, the federal government may use
military force to prevent the loss of life or wanton destruction of
property and to restore government functions and public order. In these
circumstances, federal military commanders have the authority, in
extraordinary emergency circumstances where prior authorization by the
President is impossible and duly constituted local authorities are
unable to control the situation, to engage temporarily in activities
that are necessary to quell large-scale, unexpected civil disturbances
(see DODD 3025.18).
Protection of federal property and
functions. When the need for the protection of federal property or
federal functions exists, and duly constituted local authorities are
unable to, or decline to provide adequate protection, federal action,
including the use of military forces, is authorized.
2-9. Laws passed by the U.S. congress include four exceptions to the Posse Comitatus Act. With the first
three
laws discussed below (10 USC 331–333) there is a prerequisite that the
President must take personal action, including the issuance of a
proclamation calling upon insurgents to disperse and retire peaceably
within a limited time. The four exceptions, based on law are—
10 USC 331. When
a state is unable to control domestic violence and they have requested
federal assistance, the use of the militia or Armed Forces is
authorized.
10 USC 332. When ordinary enforcement
means are unworkable due to unlawful obstructions or rebellion against
the authority of the United States, use of the militia or Armed Forces
is authorized.
10 USC 333. When a state cannot or will not
protect the constitutional rights of the citizens, due to domestic
violence or conspiracy to hinder execution of State or Federal law, the
use of the militia or Armed Forces is authorized.
House Joint
Resolution 1292. This resolution directs all departments of the U.S.
government, upon request of the Secret Service, to assist in carrying
out its statutory duties to protect government officials and major
political candidates from physical harm.
No comments:
Post a Comment