This makes all the sense in the world that the Temple is down in the City of David. The Savior said there would not even be any stone upon another to even identify where the temple had been.
In trying to argue that the temple could not be on the dome of the rock, He mentions the temple moving relative to the outer wall. It makes more sense that the southern wall is expanded over time to facilitate a greater population. Imagine all the sacrifices being made and space required for all that livestock.
It will take some tremendous personality the Jews would respect, to change their trajectory of the temple location from fort Antonio. You can show them the evidence and it won't matter. People attach themselves to a certain reasonings and you just can't fight that.
This makes all the sense in the world that the Temple is down in the City of David. The Savior said there would not even be any stone upon another to even identify where the temple had been.
ReplyDeleteIn trying to argue that the temple could not be on the dome of the rock, He mentions the temple moving relative to the outer wall. It makes more sense that the southern wall is expanded over time to facilitate a greater population. Imagine all the sacrifices being made and space required for all that livestock.
It will take some tremendous personality the Jews would respect, to change their trajectory of the temple location from fort Antonio.
You can show them the evidence and it won't matter. People attach themselves to a certain reasonings and you just can't fight that.