YOUR GAYNESS FACTOR..

Someone asked me whether they would be considered gay based on how many boys/girls they had.

I spend a little bit of time on my response - so I thought I would put it out there for consumption and for tips on "breeding" with your sweetie.  Please don't get offended - this is just an opinion of a non-medical personnel....  Not Final Judgment where you will be cast off into a sleazy bathhouse in San Fran, right before the EQ turns the whole mess upside down and disappears it's ridiculousness from ever being seen again:

Haha…. Nope I am pretty sure you are not gay!  Mar____’s dad was definitely more-so than a three dollar bill….  I was very upset even as a teen that he was selfish enough to throw his family to the wolves.  They ended up going from a beautiful large home to living in a single wide mobile home that was probably not fit for 3 people let alone six.  It was humiliating for them as children to be pillars of the community and then to be cast to the fringes of all social circles.  I really had a thing for Mar____ and hoped she would join the Church.

 I highly doubt about  ______ either – of all people.  He is kind of my definition of what a real man should be.
 Fact is this (and you will not find this stuff on the interwebz these politically correct days) – but it was clear from studies that “came out” in the late 90’s that those with lower testosterone levels have a bump in the ratio of girls over boys.  This is due to lower male sperm counts.  It can also be that the time of conception simply hit earlier in the cycle of the woman when the egg was higher in the uterus when male sperm with lower motility could not make it “over the beach” (cervix) and get high enough in the uterus with enough vibrancy left to penetrate the egg and win the battle with the competing female sperm.   pH of the woman’s uterus is also a factor – so there is a chance a woman could also contribute to this.  The tilt of the cervix in relation to the vagina is also a factor.  ______ has a very tilted cervix (high beach head – think Normandy with machine gun nests at the top) and we found out one of her ovaries was not popping out eggs every other month.  The tilted cervix makes it hard for the “lower motility” male sperm to make it over.  I solved that by changing positions during intercourse and observing (with few data points to confirm) which month we needed to “make a push” during the fertile window.  After losing Dallin, I went pretty deep in the whole fertility thing because I wanted to make sure we were able to make some good backup copies.
 Things that reflect lower testosterone levels can come from a tendency within families (does a guy have a bunch of brothers or sisters?) or just a good mix.  I come from a family that had 3b and 5g.  That is a one child swing.  _______ has no data other than herself from her biological father – and I have always wondered about it.  Counting Dallin, we ended up with a 3g and 2b mix – again, less than a one child swing.  If we had been able to have one more – and it had been a boy; or one more girl, then another boy, it would be a 4g + 3b mix.  My other brothers have a 2b +2g mix and 3g+1b mix.  My guess is that I could average them out and come to the conclusion that our “gayness factor” is probably in the middle.
 Another check is literally to look at the fingers of both hands on either side of the middle finger.  The longer your ring finger is compared to your pointer, the lower the “gayness factor” is.  At the point where the fetus gets the shot of testosterone that makes it a boy or a girl, the fingers are also developing – so this is a marker.
 Another factor is the thing above the lip but below the nose (cannot remember what it is called – septum?).  The more pronounced it is, the more testosterone a male got in the womb.  Women are VERY attracted to this in a man – precisely because it indicates an increase in testosterone levels that she can rely on to protect/father children/provide for the family unit.
 Those are all nature factors.  Nurture is a whole new set of factors.  My BIL (who is clearly a man),  is a risk-taker (just started his own Keto diet business) – yet has 8g+1b (last set of twins had a girl + a Down’s syndrome boy).  Being raised by a mother increases the gayness factor (my dad was gone a lot).   There are a ton of nurture factors that pull in.
 There was an article just the other day that said that billionaires predominantly have more boys than girls.  They are likely where they are at due to being risk-takers; which is largely attributes to higher T-levels.  This is carved in stone.
 So, the short of it is that there are TONS of factors – but part of the equation is how many phyto-estrogens a person is exposed to (check out the increase of asexual fish due to sewage treatment plants that cannot neutralize the effects of birth control pills in the effluent) – or plasticizers that are expelled into the waterways.  These all serve to feminize males (some of it, I am sure is on purpose).  Large portions of our youth who are apathetic when it comes to women (no aggressive “girl chasing”), likely are somewhat effeminized due to nurture/environment.  Our generation did not grow up with as much stuff in the environment (hormones in milk, plastics, birth control pills).  Also, drinking water in Cardston is higher up the watershed for those on city water – so we have a greater chance of not being polluted from the environment.  Folks in Lethie who are slurping up all the birth control pill-laden effluent from Cardston are probably a little gayer than we are…. Lol  Medicine Hat, a whole new level….
 Hopefully, that gives you a larger picture of the scope of what I understand of the situation out there.  I would definitely start with the finger check.  I never got to see Mar____’s dad’s fingers to verify that detail.
 Could be a timing thing of the wife when she ovulates versus increased testosterone/progesterone levels in the woman and increased chances for mating earlier in her cycle, etc.
 Hope that answers your questions.  Fact is, if you are worried, then you probably ought to be worried.  If you are not – then you probably should not be.  Kind of like questions of personal worthiness; if you are concerned about stuff going into a TR interview, then there is likely something that needs to be addressed.