Friday, July 26, 2013

Women absorb and carry living DNA and cells from every male they have sexual intercourse with

THIS GOES IN THE RANDOM FILE.......  I HAD TO CAPTURE IT SO I CAN LOOK FURTHER INTO IT.  REALLY CRAZY STUFF IF IT IS TRUE.

 
In this study they provide a description of male Mc in the female human brain and specific brain regions. The study was originally trying to determine if women who have been pregnant with a son might be more predisposed to certain neurological diseases since these certain diseases occur more frequently in males.

"Collectively with data showing the presence of male DNA in the cerebrospinal fluid [32], our results indicate that fetal DNA and likely cells can cross the human blood-brain barrier (BBB) and reside in the brain. Changes in BBB permeability occur during pregnancy [33] and may therefore provide a unique opportunity for the establishment of Mc in the brain. Also unique to our study are the findings that male Mc in the human female brain is relatively frequent (positive in 63% of subjects) and distributed in multiple brain regions, and is potentially persistent across the human lifespan (the oldest female in whom male DNA was detected in the brain was 94 years)."

Through the study they blindly and politically assume that all male Mc DNA found hosting in the female brain was from a male pregnancy. Funny how even our brightest scientists can live in denial.

BUT, when they autopsied the brains of women who had never even been pregnant they STILL found male DNA prevalent in the female brain.

They did their best to hide the evidence. They buried it in numerous sub studies but I sifted through it all and found the damning statement, the one they tried to avoid. The statement that every single article written about this extremely important study completely censored and left out.

What are they so afraid of??

"CONCLUSIONS: Male microchimerism was not infrequent in women without sons. Besides known pregnancies, other possible sources of male microchimerism include unrecognized spontaneous abortion, vanished male twin, an older brother transferred by the maternal circulation, or SEXUAL INTERCOURSE. Male microchimerism was significantly more frequent and levels were higher in women with induced abortion than in women with other pregnancy histories. Further studies are needed to determine specific origins of male microchimerism in women."

Its so convenient how they flat out ignore the MOST OBVIOUS source of microchimerism male DNA hosting inside the female body. And the periodicals just deleted it alltogether. The scum bags.

This has very important ramifications for women. Especially promiscuous women who practice unprotected sexual intercourse. Every male you absorb spermatazoa from becomes a living part of you FOR LIFE. The women autopsied in this study were elderly. Some had carried the living male DNA for well over 50 years!

I love how the agenda has convinced young ladies to be promiscuous. They knowingly are sabotaging generations of young women. Of COURSE they are.

The male DNA can also pass into and become part of a fetus from an entirely different male. So if your woman has a long track record, then your kids are likely carrying DNA from her past hookups.

We have only begun to understand the power and ramifications of this.

3 comments:

  1. Where is your source materials?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I am doing more research on this - but I can tell you, I am glad I did not "spread my seed" - nor did my wife before we got married. Even oral sex - which is such a pandemic among the youth these days. Wow - the law of chastity is there for a reason...... People are so mis-guided and lost these days.

      Delete
  2. Nice way to turn an off-hand aside comment at the end of a study and turn it into a federal case. That's not how science works. Aside comments are at best just filler and often media-bait, and everyone who's ever bothered to read a published study realizes this. There is no evidence, direct, indirect or otherwise for this and it was TOTAL speculation on the part of the authors. In fact, if you read the following earlier study, it's made VERY clear that intercourse is the least-likely source of male microchimeric DNA: http://bloodjournal.hematologylibrary.org/content/100/8/2845.long

    ReplyDelete