Tuesday, November 20, 2012

THE SECOND ANOINTING - PART II

This stuff is rated SM, for spiritually mature audiences only.....  It pretty much is beyond the mark if a person is struggling with basic stuff.  There has been alot of info on the blog about the second comforter - the same thing applies.  It is for this reason that the Church simply does not openly talk of it.   A reader openly stated something about the Second Comforter on FB the other day - and I was heartened that she had the courage to do so - for that is pretty clearly found in scripture and ALL members of the Church should be encouraging each other to seek for it and should be our goal after we have made and are consistently keeping temple covenants.  I think a comment I made scared her public efforts to disseminate a good principle and she pulled the reference to it.  Few people probably knew how to react to it - because it simply is not talked about - but I was impressed that someone had the courage to bring it up on an open forum to let the light shine out.  I do have to say here that, after receiving a second witness, one should not openly disclose it - at least in a boastful or open manner.  That is a specific thing given to the individual/couple and should be kept in confidence.  The encouragement of others to pursue it to that end should, however, be openly advocated.

I was on a forum on LDSFF talking about the wife laying hands on her husband's head and blessing him - and my spirit literally lept for joy within me.  The concept was "delicious" in the extreme to me - and I knew it was a good thing.  I do not understand that role to a great degree, but I know its underutilized - the couple could be/should be doing so much more as they grow together.  Now, I have not had my wife lay her hands on me (other than the spontaneous backhand when I get her goose) - but I know its a correct concept.  The women in our lives are not utilizing "their priesthood" to the level that it was ever intended.  We are hobbled to a great degree.  Probably from general wickedness in the general membership of the Church - but we do not exercise all that was given to the early members of the Church.  It is for this reason that one of my favorite things to do is to read early Church history and find out all the cool things the sisters did with their priesthood - which go far beyond what is done today with the limited ordinances they perform in our latter-day Temple ceremonies. 

When one considers how the resurrection will occur - the mechanics and order of it - the second part of the second anointing makes complete sense.  It also cements the fact in my mind that Jesus was married to the woman (an most likely others) who performed the ordinance on His behalf shortly before he died.  The one who was recorded as having performed the ordinance was likely the first or pre-eminent wife and would likely have been the first one He has raised (or will raise) and who will assist in raising the others whom He was given; there is order in everything as God's kingdom is a kingdom of order and not of confusion.  And the ordinance was hidden there the entire time in plain sight - as it all is for those who have eyes to see and ears to hear.  Here is the order of the resurrection - it formally will go from father to son to the son's wife to their male children and so on down to the last one in the chain whose work has been performed.  If all things are done in order, my wife will have anointed me through the second anointing to that end.  After our deaths, I will be raised by the previous righteous patriarch in my line - my father, I expect.  I will then raise my wife and we TOGETHER will raise our sons - and what a sweet moment that will be to stand over the grave that my father and I dedicated over 10 years ago and command our beloved little Dallin to come forth from the grave.  What a neat, sweet and wonderful experience that will be - one that the thought of keeps me going on difficult days.

So that is the order of it.  Here is a little more on the second anointing:

Second anointing

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
In the Latter Day Saint movement, the second anointing, also known historically and in Latter Day Saint scripture as the fulness of the priesthood, is an obscure and relatively rare ordinance usually conducted in temples as extension of the Nauvoo Endowment ceremony. Founder Joseph Smith, Jr. cited the "fulness of the priesthood" as one of the reasons for building the Nauvoo Temple (D&C 124:28). In the ordinance, a participant is anointed as a "priest and king" or a "priestess and queen", and is sealed to the highest degree of salvation available in Mormon theology. Those who participate in this ordinance are said to have their "calling and election made sure",[1][2] and their celestial marriage "sealed by the holy spirit of promise".[3] They are said to have received the "more sure word of prophecy".
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church), the largest Latter Day Saint denomination, has performed the ceremony for nominated couples from the 1840s to at least the mid-1900s. Current information about the practice by that denomination, or whether the ordinance is still in use, has not been made public. A former LDS stake president, Tom Phillips, claims he participated in the ritual in 2002. He described his experience anonymously here in 2008,[4] and exposed his true identity in 2012.[5] The ordinance is also performed by many Mormon fundamentalist groups. However, it is not performed by denominations, such as the Community of Christ, who historically never practiced the Nauvoo Endowment ceremony.

Contents

History

Although Joseph Smith, Jr. introduced the Nauvoo Endowment in 1842, he came to understand that his work in establishing the "fullness of the priesthood" was not yet complete.[6] In August 1843, church leader Brigham Young stated that "[i]f any in the Church had the fullness of the priesthood, he did not know it", nevertheless, Young understood that the "fullness of the priesthood" involved an anointing as "king and priest", with the actual kingdom to be given later.[7]
The initial second anointing took place on September 28, 1843, when Joseph and his wife Emma Smith received it.[8] During Smith's lifetime, the second anointing was given to at least 20 men and 17 women (Buerger 1983, pp. 22–23). After Smith was murdered by a mob in June 1844, Brigham Young was eventually selected as prophet of the LDS Church, and in January 1846, he began administering the second anointing in the nearly-completed Nauvoo Temple. Young re-administered the ordinance to many of those who had received it under Joseph Smith, and he delegated his authority to others, who performed nearly 600 second anointings (some to polygamous unions) before the temple was closed on February 7, 1846 (Buerger 1983, p. 26).
After migration to Utah, the LDS Church did not conduct further second anointings until late 1866.[9] Beginning in the 1870s, second anointings were performed vicariously (Buerger 1983, p. 30). In the 1880s, then President of the Church John Taylor was concerned that too many second anointings were being performed, and he instituted a series of procedural safeguards, requiring recommendation by a stake president, and a guideline that the ordinance "belonged particularly to old men" (Buerger 1983, pp. 32–33). In 1901, President Lorenzo Snow further limited accessibility to the ordinance by outlining stringent criteria for worthiness (Buerger 1983, pp. 33–34).
By 1918, over 14,000 second anointings had been performed for the living and the dead. (Buerger 1983, p. 39). During the administration of Heber J. Grant in the 1920s, however, the frequency of second anointings was dramatically reduced. Stake presidents were no longer allowed to recommend candidates for the ordinance, that privilege falling only to members of the Quorum of Twelve Apostles (Buerger 1983, pp. 39–40). By 1941, just under 15,000 second anointings had been performed for the living, and just over 6,000 for the dead (Buerger 1983, p. 41). The church has not allowed historians to have access to second anointing records subsequent to 1941; therefore, the current frequency of anointings is obscure. However, it is known that in 1942, 13 of the church's 32 General Authorities had not received the second anointing (Buerger 1983, p. 41). By 1949, the practice had been comparatively "practically discontinued" by the LDS Church, though in 1981 it continued "to be performed--albeit on a small scale".[10]

Ceremony

According to 19th-century journal entries, the second anointing ceremony consisted of two parts. The first part consisted of a washing and anointing of the bodies of the participants by an officiator. The second part took place some time later, and was conducted without an officiator in a private ceremony between a married couple, in which the wife symbolically prepared her husband for his death and resurrection (Buerger 1983, pp. 26–27).

Meaning and symbolism

The "first anointing" refers to the washing and anointing part of the Endowment ceremony, in which a person is anointed to become a king and priest or a queen and priestess unto God. In the second anointing, on the other hand, participants are anointed as a king and priest, or queen and priestess. When the anointing is given, according to Brigham Young, the participant "will then have received the fulness of the Priesthood, all that can be given on earth."[11]
Thus, the second anointing differs from the "first anointing" (part of the Endowment ceremony) in that, the first anointing promises blessings in the afterlife contingent on the patron's faithfulness, the Second Anointing actually bestows those blessings. According to prominent 20th-century Latter-day Saint Apostle Bruce R. McConkie, those who have their calling and election made sure "receive the more sure word of prophecy, which means that the Lord seals their exaltation upon them while they are yet in this life. ... [T]heir exaltation is assured." [12]
The second anointing may have been intended to symbolize or to literally fulfill scriptural references to the fulness of the priesthood such as in the Doctrine and Covenants, Section 124:28, a revelation by Joseph Smith, Jr. commanding the building of a temple in Nauvoo, Illinois, in part, because "there is not a place found on earth that he may come to and restore again that which was lost unto you, or which he hath taken away, even the fulness of the priesthood." (emphasis added). LDS Church leaders often connect this ordinance with a statement by Peter in his second Epistle. In 2 Peter 1:10, he talks about making one's "calling and election sure," and further remarks, "We have also a more sure word of prophecy" (2 Peter 1:19). Joseph Smith, Jr. referenced this process in saying, "When the Lord has thoroughly proved [a person], and finds that the [person] is determined to serve Him at all hazards, then the [person] will find his[/her] calling and election made sure".[13]
The second anointing is given only to married couples. A few writers have argued that because of this women who receive the second anointing, in which they are anointed queens and priestesses, are ordained to the "fulness of the priesthood" the same as their husbands. These scholars feel that Joseph Smith may have considered these women to have, in fact, received the power of the priesthood (though not necessarily a specific priesthood office).[14]

Notes

  1. ^ Smith (1976, pp. 322–23) ("The anointing and sealing is to be called, elected and made sure")
  2. ^ Doxey (1992) (discussing the result of "calling and election", but not referring to second anointing).
  3. ^ Flake (1992) (defining "holy spirit of promise").
  4. ^ [1]
  5. ^ [2]
  6. ^ History of the Church, 5:139-40 (Aug. 31, 1842), speaking to the Relief Society.
  7. ^ Journal of Wilford Woodruff, Aug. 6, 1843; also in History of the Church, 5:527.
  8. ^ Diary of Joseph Smith, 28 Sept. 1843; Wilford Woodruff, Historian's Private Journal (1858), p. 24 (LDS Archives).
  9. ^ Journal of Wilford Woodruff, December 30, 31, 1866.
  10. ^ Buerger 1983, p. 41, citing a letter by apostle George F. Richards, who was attempting to revive the practice.
  11. ^ Journal of Heber C. Kimball, 26 Dec. 1845 (quoting Brigham Young).
  12. ^ Bruce R. McConkie, Mormon Doctrine, 2nd edition, p. 109–110
  13. ^ Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, p. 150, paraphrased by Roy W. Doxey in The Latter-day Prophets and the Doctrine and Covenants, pp. 406–409
  14. ^ D. Michael Quinn, "Mormon Women have had the Priesthood Since 1843," in Hanks, ed., Women and Authority: Re-emerging Mormon Feminism

References

5 comments:

  1. All ordinances performed by man only open the door for the real thing; they are symbolic of the real thing. The real thing can only be given by God. For example baptism by water is symbolic of the real thing, the baptism of fire. The baptism of fire is performed by Jesus.

    3 Nephi 9
    20 And ye shall offer for a sacrifice unto me a broken heart and a contrite spirit. And whoso cometh unto me with a broken heart and a contrite spirit, him will I baptize with fire and with the Holy Ghost, even as the Lamanites, because of their faith in me at the time of their conversion, were baptized with fire and with the Holy Ghost, and they knew it not.

    With priesthood powers it is the same. We can be given authority to act, but the true power can only come from God. (D&C 121)

    When God has tested us true and faithful in the practice of the priesthood, then he will bestow upon us the real thing, the real power. Then we will have the power in us and we truly become like him.

    1 John 3:2 Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is.

    The second annointing is the same. I know those that have received the real thing, and it only comes from Angels or God himself.


    ReplyDelete
  2. Thought this went well with your thoughts on women and priesthood blessings...

    "A wife does not hold the priesthood in connection with her husband, but she enjoys the benefits thereof with him; and if she is requested to lay hands on the sick with him, or with any other officer holding the Melchizedek priesthood, she may do so with perfect propriety. It is no uncommon thing for a man and wife unitedly to administer to their children." (Improvement Era, Feb. 1907, p. 308).

    Also, something my mission president brought up...

    "The saints need the powers of the priesthood, which are the powers of the spirit, active and alive in the home perhaps even more than they are needed in the wards and stakes. Our homes need wives and mothers filled with the gifts and powers of the spirit standing at the head of their homes beside their husbands, just as much as our wards and stakes need leaders filled with the spirit. Administering is what happens within the walls of the Church buildings, and is always directed by priesthood authority. Ministering, however, is what happens within the walls of homes where mother and father may exercise their spiritual gifts for the benefit of their posterity."

    ReplyDelete
  3. 1 Then Naomi her mother in law said unto her, My daughter, shall I not seek rest for thee, that it may be well with thee?

    2 And now is not Boaz of our kindred, with whose maidens thou wast? Behold, he winnoweth barley to night in the threshingfloor.

    3 Wash thyself therefore, and anoint thee, and put thy raiment upon thee, and get thee down to the floor: but make not thyself known unto the man, until he shall have done eating and drinking.

    4 And it shall be, when he lieth down, that thou shalt mark the place where he shall lie, and thou shalt go in, and uncover his feet, and lay thee down; and he will tell thee what thou shalt do.

    5 And she said unto her, All that thou sayest unto me I will do.

    6 ¶And she went down unto the floor, and did according to all that her mother in law bade her.

    7 And when Boaz had eaten and drunk, and his heart was merry, he went to lie down at the end of the heap of acorn: and she came softly, and uncovered his feet, and laid her down.

    8 ¶And it came to pass at midnight, that the man was afraid, and turned himself: and, behold, a woman lay at his feet.

    9 And he said, Who art thou? And she answered, I am Ruth thine handmaid: spread therefore thy skirt over thine handmaid; for thou art a near kinsman.

    10 And he said, Blessed be thou of the Lord, my daughter: for thou hast shewed more kindness in the latter end than at the beginning, inasmuch as thou followedst not young men, whether poor or rich.

    11 And now, my daughter, fear not; I will do to thee all that thou requirest: for all the city of my people doth know that thou art a virtuous woman.

    12 And now it is true that I am thy near kinsman: howbeit there is a kinsman nearer than I.

    13 Tarry this night, and it shall be in the morning, that if he will perform unto thee the apart of a kinsman, well; let him do the kinsman’s part: but if he will not do the part of a kinsman to thee, then will I do the part of a kinsman to thee, as the Lord liveth: lie down until the morning.

    ReplyDelete
  4. "Now when I passed by thee, and looked upon thee, behold, thy time was the time of love; and I spread my skirt over thee, and covered thy nakedness: yea, I sware unto thee, and entered into a covenant with thee, saith the Lord God, and thou becamest mine.

    Then washed I thee with water; yea, I throughly washed away thy blood from thee, and I anointed thee with oil.
    - Ezekiel 16:8-9

    ReplyDelete
  5. Second anointings are not something people banter about nor treat lightly. Best stick to other topics.

    ReplyDelete